2011 J/111 vs Hunter 356 — Comparison

2011 J/111
VS
Hunter 356Hunter 356

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2011 J/111Hunter 356
General
ManufacturerJ/BoatsHunter
Year20112000–2005
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerAlan JohnstoneGlenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA11.13 m (36.5 ft)10.82 m (35.5 ft)
LWL9.75 m (32.0 ft)9.30 m (30.5 ft)
Beam3.40 m (11.2 ft)3.53 m (11.6 ft)
Draft2.20 m (7.2 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)
Ballast2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area71.0 m² (764 ft²)53.0 m² (571 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2011 J/111
24.71
Hunter 356
17.40
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2011 J/111
40.90
Hunter 356
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2011 J/111
0.80
Hunter 356
0.80
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2011 J/111
14.54
Hunter 356
16.38

Detailed Comparison

The 2011 J/111 and Hunter 356 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2011 J/111 is a modern design by J/Boats from USA, while the Hunter 356 is a 2000s offering from Hunter from USA. The 2011 J/111 was penned by Alan Johnstone. The Hunter 356 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the 2011 J/111 measures 11.13m (36.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.40m, compared to the Hunter 356 at 10.82m (35.5ft) with a 3.53m beam. The 2011 J/111 is 0.31m longer than the Hunter 356. The Hunter 356 displaces approximately 9% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2011 J/111 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 24.71 and 71.0 m² of sail area. The Hunter 356, with an SA/D of 17.40 and 53.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2011 J/111 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2011 J/111 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 14.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The Hunter 356 has a comfort ratio of 16.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.80. The ballast ratios are 40.9% for the 2011 J/111 and 40.0% for the Hunter 356, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2011 J/111 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The Hunter 356 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Hunter 356 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2011 J/111 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2011 J/111 · Hunter 356