2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser vs 1982 Westerly Konsort — Comparison

2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser
VS
1982 Westerly Konsort1982 Westerly Konsort

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser1982 Westerly Konsort
General
ManufacturerBavariaWesterly
Year2012–20161982–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyUK
DesignerFarr Yacht DesignEd Dubois
Dimensions
LOA9.99 m (32.8 ft)9.50 m (31.2 ft)
LWL8.95 m (29.4 ft)7.70 m (25.3 ft)
Beam3.42 m (11.2 ft)3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft1.85 m (6.1 ft)1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,400 kg (11,905 lbs)4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast1,600 kg (3,527 lbs)1,633 kg (3,600 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area52.0 m² (560 ft²)34.0 m² (366 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinBilge
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity65 L (17.2 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity120 L (31.7 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser
17.17
1982 Westerly Konsort
12.61
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser
29.63
1982 Westerly Konsort
36.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser
0.78
1982 Westerly Konsort
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser
18.80
1982 Westerly Konsort
22.75

Detailed Comparison

The 2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser and 1982 Westerly Konsort represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser is a modern design by Bavaria from Germany, while the 1982 Westerly Konsort is a 1980s offering from Westerly from UK. The 2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser was penned by Farr Yacht Design. The 1982 Westerly Konsort was designed by Ed Dubois.

In terms of size, the 2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser measures 9.99m (32.8ft) overall with a beam of 3.42m, compared to the 1982 Westerly Konsort at 9.50m (31.2ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser is 0.49m longer than the 1982 Westerly Konsort. The 2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser displaces approximately 19% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.17 and 52.0 m² of sail area. The 1982 Westerly Konsort, with an SA/D of 12.61 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1982 Westerly Konsort has a comfort ratio of 22.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 29.6% for the 2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser and 36.0% for the 1982 Westerly Konsort, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 120L of water capacity and 65L of fuel. The 1982 Westerly Konsort offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 Westerly Konsort is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser · 1982 Westerly Konsort