2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser vs 1987 Cape Dory 40 — Comparison

2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser
VS
1987 Cape Dory 40

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser1987 Cape Dory 40
General
ManufacturerBavariaCape Dory
Year2012–20161987–1992
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyUSA
DesignerFarr Yacht DesignCarl Alberg
Dimensions
LOA9.99 m (32.8 ft)12.19 m (40.0 ft)
LWL8.95 m (29.4 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam3.42 m (11.2 ft)3.66 m (12.0 ft)
Draft1.85 m (6.1 ft)1.68 m (5.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,400 kg (11,905 lbs)8,618 kg (18,999 lbs)
Ballast1,600 kg (3,527 lbs)3,629 kg (8,001 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area52.0 m² (560 ft²)64.5 m² (694 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFull
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity65 L (17.2 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Water Capacity120 L (31.7 gal)284 L (75.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser
17.17
1987 Cape Dory 40
15.59
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser
29.63
1987 Cape Dory 40
42.11
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser
0.78
1987 Cape Dory 40
0.72
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser
18.80
1987 Cape Dory 40
22.29

Detailed Comparison

The 2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser and 1987 Cape Dory 40 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser is a modern design by Bavaria from Germany, while the 1987 Cape Dory 40 is a 1980s offering from Cape Dory from USA. The 2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser was penned by Farr Yacht Design. The 1987 Cape Dory 40 was designed by Carl Alberg.

In terms of size, the 2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser measures 9.99m (32.8ft) overall with a beam of 3.42m, compared to the 1987 Cape Dory 40 at 12.19m (40.0ft) with a 3.66m beam. The 1987 Cape Dory 40 is 2.20m longer than the 2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser. The 1987 Cape Dory 40 displaces approximately 60% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.17 and 52.0 m² of sail area. The 1987 Cape Dory 40, with an SA/D of 15.59 and 64.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1987 Cape Dory 40 has a comfort ratio of 22.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 29.6% for the 2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser and 42.1% for the 1987 Cape Dory 40, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 120L of water capacity and 65L of fuel. The 1987 Cape Dory 40 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 284L water and 151L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1987 Cape Dory 40 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1987 Cape Dory 40 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser · 1987 Cape Dory 40