2012 Hallberg-Rassy 64 vs 2010 Oyster 625 — Comparison

2012 Hallberg-Rassy 64
VS
2010 Oyster 625

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2012 Hallberg-Rassy 642010 Oyster 625
General
ManufacturerHallberg-RassyOyster
Year2012–20202010–2018
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenUnited Kingdom
DesignerGerman FrersRob Humphreys
Dimensions
LOA19.50 m (64.0 ft)19.00 m (62.3 ft)
LWL16.80 m (55.1 ft)16.00 m (52.5 ft)
Beam5.30 m (17.4 ft)5.10 m (16.7 ft)
Draft2.70 m (8.9 ft)2.55 m (8.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement30,000 kg (66,139 lbs)28,000 kg (61,729 lbs)
Ballast11,000 kg (24,251 lbs)10,500 kg (23,149 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area165.0 m² (1,776 ft²)155.0 m² (1,668 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine230 HP200 HP
Fuel Capacity900 L (237.8 gal)700 L (184.9 gal)
Water Capacity1300 L (343.4 gal)1100 L (290.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths88
Cabins44

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2012 Hallberg-Rassy 64
17.35
2010 Oyster 625
17.07
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2012 Hallberg-Rassy 64
36.67
2010 Oyster 625
37.50
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2012 Hallberg-Rassy 64
0.68
2010 Oyster 625
0.67
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2012 Hallberg-Rassy 64
16.11
2010 Oyster 625
17.19

Detailed Comparison

The 2012 Hallberg-Rassy 64 and 2010 Oyster 625 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2012 Hallberg-Rassy 64 is a modern design by Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden, while the 2010 Oyster 625 is a modern offering from Oyster from United Kingdom. The 2012 Hallberg-Rassy 64 was penned by German Frers. The 2010 Oyster 625 was designed by Rob Humphreys.

In terms of size, the 2012 Hallberg-Rassy 64 measures 19.50m (64.0ft) overall with a beam of 5.30m, compared to the 2010 Oyster 625 at 19.00m (62.3ft) with a 5.10m beam. The 2012 Hallberg-Rassy 64 is 0.50m longer than the 2010 Oyster 625. The 2012 Hallberg-Rassy 64 displaces approximately 7% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2012 Hallberg-Rassy 64 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.35 and 165.0 m² of sail area. The 2010 Oyster 625, with an SA/D of 17.07 and 155.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2012 Hallberg-Rassy 64 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2012 Hallberg-Rassy 64 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.68). The 2010 Oyster 625 has a comfort ratio of 17.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.67. The ballast ratios are 36.7% for the 2012 Hallberg-Rassy 64 and 37.5% for the 2010 Oyster 625, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2012 Hallberg-Rassy 64 provides 8 berths in 4 cabins with 1300L of water capacity and 900L of fuel. The 2010 Oyster 625 offers 8 berths in 4 cabins with 1100L water and 700L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2010 Oyster 625 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2012 Hallberg-Rassy 64 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2012 Hallberg-Rassy 64 · 2010 Oyster 625