2012 Sabre 48 vs 2006 Tartan 4400 — Comparison

2012 Sabre 482012 Sabre 48
VS
2006 Tartan 4400

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2012 Sabre 482006 Tartan 4400
General
ManufacturerSabreTartan
Year20122006–2014
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerJim TaylorTim Jackett
Dimensions
LOA14.63 m (48.0 ft)13.41 m (44.0 ft)
LWL12.50 m (41.0 ft)11.58 m (38.0 ft)
Beam4.30 m (14.1 ft)4.11 m (13.5 ft)
Draft2.10 m (6.9 ft)2.23 m (7.3 ft)
Weight
Displacement13,608 kg (30,000 lbs)11,340 kg (25,000 lbs)
Ballast5,216 kg (11,499 lbs)4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area96.0 m² (1,033 ft²)88.0 m² (947 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine100 HP75 HP
Fuel Capacity284 L (75.0 gal)230 L (60.8 gal)
Water Capacity454 L (119.9 gal)416 L (109.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths78
Cabins33

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2012 Sabre 48
17.11
2006 Tartan 4400
17.71
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2012 Sabre 48
38.33
2006 Tartan 4400
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2012 Sabre 48
0.72
2006 Tartan 4400
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2012 Sabre 48
17.35
2006 Tartan 4400
18.02

Detailed Comparison

The 2012 Sabre 48 and 2006 Tartan 4400 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2012 Sabre 48 is a modern design by Sabre from USA, while the 2006 Tartan 4400 is a 2000s offering from Tartan from USA. The 2012 Sabre 48 was penned by Jim Taylor. The 2006 Tartan 4400 was designed by Tim Jackett.

In terms of size, the 2012 Sabre 48 measures 14.63m (48.0ft) overall with a beam of 4.30m, compared to the 2006 Tartan 4400 at 13.41m (44.0ft) with a 4.11m beam. The 2012 Sabre 48 is 1.22m longer than the 2006 Tartan 4400. The 2012 Sabre 48 displaces approximately 20% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2012 Sabre 48 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.11 and 96.0 m² of sail area. The 2006 Tartan 4400, with an SA/D of 17.71 and 88.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2006 Tartan 4400 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2012 Sabre 48 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.72). The 2006 Tartan 4400 has a comfort ratio of 18.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 38.3% for the 2012 Sabre 48 and 40.0% for the 2006 Tartan 4400, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2012 Sabre 48 provides 7 berths in 3 cabins with 454L of water capacity and 284L of fuel. The 2006 Tartan 4400 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 416L water and 230L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2006 Tartan 4400 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2006 Tartan 4400 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2006 Tartan 4400 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2012 Sabre 48 · 2006 Tartan 4400