Catalina 425 vs 1998 Feeling 44 — Comparison

Catalina 425Catalina 425
VS
1998 Feeling 44

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationCatalina 4251998 Feeling 44
General
ManufacturerCatalinaFeeling
Year20131998–2005
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAFrance
DesignerGerry DouglasPhilippe Harlé / Mortain & Mavrikios
Dimensions
LOA12.95 m (42.5 ft)13.41 m (44.0 ft)
LWL11.28 m (37.0 ft)11.50 m (37.7 ft)
Beam3.96 m (13.0 ft)4.10 m (13.5 ft)
Draft2.06 m (6.8 ft)1.90 m (6.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,616 kg (21,200 lbs)10,500 kg (23,149 lbs)
Ballast3,719 kg (8,199 lbs)4,000 kg (8,818 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area78.0 m² (840 ft²)82.0 m² (883 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine55 HP55 HP
Fuel Capacity152 L (40.2 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Water Capacity322 L (85.1 gal)400 L (105.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths78
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Catalina 425
17.52
1998 Feeling 44
17.37
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Catalina 425
38.68
1998 Feeling 44
38.10
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Catalina 425
0.75
1998 Feeling 44
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Catalina 425
17.02
1998 Feeling 44
16.90

Detailed Comparison

The Catalina 425 and 1998 Feeling 44 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Catalina 425 is a modern design by Catalina from USA, while the 1998 Feeling 44 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The Catalina 425 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1998 Feeling 44 was designed by Philippe Harlé / Mortain & Mavrikios.

In terms of size, the Catalina 425 measures 12.95m (42.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.96m, compared to the 1998 Feeling 44 at 13.41m (44.0ft) with a 4.10m beam. The 1998 Feeling 44 is 0.46m longer than the Catalina 425. The 1998 Feeling 44 displaces approximately 9% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Catalina 425 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.52 and 78.0 m² of sail area. The 1998 Feeling 44, with an SA/D of 17.37 and 82.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Catalina 425 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Catalina 425 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1998 Feeling 44 has a comfort ratio of 16.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 38.7% for the Catalina 425 and 38.1% for the 1998 Feeling 44, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Catalina 425 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 322L of water capacity and 152L of fuel. The 1998 Feeling 44 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 400L water and 200L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Catalina 425 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 425 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1998 Feeling 44 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Catalina 425 · 1998 Feeling 44