Catalina 425 vs 2003 Sabre 402 — Comparison

Catalina 425Catalina 425
VS
2003 Sabre 402

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationCatalina 4252003 Sabre 402
General
ManufacturerCatalinaSabre
Year20132003–2010
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGerry DouglasJim Taylor
Dimensions
LOA12.95 m (42.5 ft)12.19 m (40.0 ft)
LWL11.28 m (37.0 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
Beam3.96 m (13.0 ft)3.72 m (12.2 ft)
Draft2.06 m (6.8 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,616 kg (21,200 lbs)8,165 kg (18,001 lbs)
Ballast3,719 kg (8,199 lbs)3,266 kg (7,200 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area78.0 m² (840 ft²)66.0 m² (710 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine55 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity152 L (40.2 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Water Capacity322 L (85.1 gal)227 L (60.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths77
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Catalina 425
17.52
2003 Sabre 402
16.54
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Catalina 425
38.68
2003 Sabre 402
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Catalina 425
0.75
2003 Sabre 402
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Catalina 425
17.02
2003 Sabre 402
18.32

Detailed Comparison

The Catalina 425 and 2003 Sabre 402 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Catalina 425 is a modern design by Catalina from USA, while the 2003 Sabre 402 is a 2000s offering from Sabre from USA. The Catalina 425 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 2003 Sabre 402 was designed by Jim Taylor.

In terms of size, the Catalina 425 measures 12.95m (42.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.96m, compared to the 2003 Sabre 402 at 12.19m (40.0ft) with a 3.72m beam. The Catalina 425 is 0.76m longer than the 2003 Sabre 402. The Catalina 425 displaces approximately 18% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Catalina 425 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.52 and 78.0 m² of sail area. The 2003 Sabre 402, with an SA/D of 16.54 and 66.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Catalina 425 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Catalina 425 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 2003 Sabre 402 has a comfort ratio of 18.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 38.7% for the Catalina 425 and 40.0% for the 2003 Sabre 402, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Catalina 425 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 322L of water capacity and 152L of fuel. The 2003 Sabre 402 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L water and 151L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2003 Sabre 402 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 425 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Catalina 425 · 2003 Sabre 402