Catalina 315 vs 1973 Ranger 33 — Comparison

Catalina 315Catalina 315
VS
1973 Ranger 331973 Ranger 33

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationCatalina 3151973 Ranger 33
General
ManufacturerCatalinaRanger
Year20141973–1979
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGerry DouglasGary Mull
Dimensions
LOA9.45 m (31.0 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL8.61 m (28.2 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam3.20 m (10.5 ft)3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)4,763 kg (10,501 lbs)
Ballast1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area44.0 m² (474 ft²)43.0 m² (463 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity132 L (34.9 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Catalina 315
16.32
1973 Ranger 33
15.43
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Catalina 315
39.99
1973 Ranger 33
42.85
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Catalina 315
0.77
1973 Ranger 33
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Catalina 315
18.85
1973 Ranger 33
21.50

Detailed Comparison

The Catalina 315 and 1973 Ranger 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Catalina 315 is a modern design by Catalina from USA, while the 1973 Ranger 33 is a 1970s offering from Ranger from USA. The Catalina 315 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1973 Ranger 33 was designed by Gary Mull.

In terms of size, the Catalina 315 measures 9.45m (31.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.20m, compared to the 1973 Ranger 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 1973 Ranger 33 is 0.61m longer than the Catalina 315. The 1973 Ranger 33 displaces approximately 5% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Catalina 315 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.32 and 44.0 m² of sail area. The 1973 Ranger 33, with an SA/D of 15.43 and 43.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Catalina 315 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Catalina 315 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1973 Ranger 33 has a comfort ratio of 21.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the Catalina 315 and 42.9% for the 1973 Ranger 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Catalina 315 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 132L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1973 Ranger 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1973 Ranger 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 315 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1973 Ranger 33 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Catalina 315 · 1973 Ranger 33