2014 Hallberg-Rassy 48 vs 1996 Moody 45 — Comparison

2014 Hallberg-Rassy 48
VS
1996 Moody 451996 Moody 45

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2014 Hallberg-Rassy 481996 Moody 45
General
ManufacturerHallberg-RassyMoody
Year2014–20171996–2002
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenUK
DesignerGerman FrersBill Dixon
Dimensions
LOA14.73 m (48.3 ft)13.72 m (45.0 ft)
LWL12.70 m (41.7 ft)11.50 m (37.7 ft)
Beam4.35 m (14.3 ft)4.22 m (13.8 ft)
Draft2.15 m (7.1 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement14,500 kg (31,967 lbs)12,500 kg (27,558 lbs)
Ballast5,300 kg (11,684 lbs)4,900 kg (10,803 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area101.0 m² (1,087 ft²)85.0 m² (915 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine110 HP55 HP
Fuel Capacity380 L (100.4 gal)250 L (66.0 gal)
Water Capacity650 L (171.7 gal)450 L (118.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths78
Cabins33

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2014 Hallberg-Rassy 48
17.25
1996 Moody 45
16.03
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2014 Hallberg-Rassy 48
36.55
1996 Moody 45
39.20
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2014 Hallberg-Rassy 48
0.71
1996 Moody 45
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2014 Hallberg-Rassy 48
17.74
1996 Moody 45
19.06

Detailed Comparison

The 2014 Hallberg-Rassy 48 and 1996 Moody 45 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2014 Hallberg-Rassy 48 is a modern design by Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden, while the 1996 Moody 45 is a 1990s offering from Moody from UK. The 2014 Hallberg-Rassy 48 was penned by German Frers. The 1996 Moody 45 was designed by Bill Dixon.

In terms of size, the 2014 Hallberg-Rassy 48 measures 14.73m (48.3ft) overall with a beam of 4.35m, compared to the 1996 Moody 45 at 13.72m (45.0ft) with a 4.22m beam. The 2014 Hallberg-Rassy 48 is 1.01m longer than the 1996 Moody 45. The 2014 Hallberg-Rassy 48 displaces approximately 16% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2014 Hallberg-Rassy 48 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.25 and 101.0 m² of sail area. The 1996 Moody 45, with an SA/D of 16.03 and 85.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2014 Hallberg-Rassy 48 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2014 Hallberg-Rassy 48 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.71). The 1996 Moody 45 has a comfort ratio of 19.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 36.6% for the 2014 Hallberg-Rassy 48 and 39.2% for the 1996 Moody 45, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2014 Hallberg-Rassy 48 provides 7 berths in 3 cabins with 650L of water capacity and 380L of fuel. The 1996 Moody 45 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 450L water and 250L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1996 Moody 45 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2014 Hallberg-Rassy 48 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1996 Moody 45 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2014 Hallberg-Rassy 48 · 1996 Moody 45