2017 Lagoon 42 vs 2013 Elan 350 — Comparison

2017 Lagoon 422017 Lagoon 42
VS
2013 Elan 350

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2017 Lagoon 422013 Elan 350
General
ManufacturerLagoonElan
Year20172013–2018
TypeCatamaranSloop
CountryFranceSlovenia
DesignerVPLP / Nauta DesignRob Humphreys
Dimensions
LOA12.80 m (42.0 ft)10.67 m (35.0 ft)
LWL12.05 m (39.5 ft)9.30 m (30.5 ft)
Beam7.70 m (25.3 ft)3.46 m (11.4 ft)
Draft1.25 m (4.1 ft)2.00 m (6.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement11,200 kg (24,692 lbs)6,100 kg (13,448 lbs)
Ballast1,850 kg (4,079 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area87.0 m² (937 ft²)58.0 m² (624 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeMini KeelFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine2 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity400 L (105.7 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity780 L (206.1 gal)170 L (44.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths106
Cabins42

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2017 Lagoon 42
17.65
2013 Elan 350
17.65
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2017 Lagoon 42
0.00
2013 Elan 350
30.33
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2017 Lagoon 42
1.38
2013 Elan 350
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2017 Lagoon 42
7.53
2013 Elan 350
19.02

Detailed Comparison

The 2017 Lagoon 42 and 2013 Elan 350 represent different approaches to sailboat design. The 2017 Lagoon 42 is a modern design by Lagoon from France, while the 2013 Elan 350 is a modern offering from Elan from Slovenia. The 2017 Lagoon 42 was penned by VPLP / Nauta Design. The 2013 Elan 350 was designed by Rob Humphreys.

In terms of size, the 2017 Lagoon 42 measures 12.80m (42.0ft) overall with a beam of 7.70m, compared to the 2013 Elan 350 at 10.67m (35.0ft) with a 3.46m beam. The 2017 Lagoon 42 is 2.13m longer than the 2013 Elan 350. The 2017 Lagoon 42 displaces approximately 84% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2017 Lagoon 42 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.65 and 87.0 m² of sail area. The 2013 Elan 350, with an SA/D of 17.65 and 58.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2017 Lagoon 42 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2017 Lagoon 42 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 7.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 1.38). The 2013 Elan 350 has a comfort ratio of 19.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 0.0% for the 2017 Lagoon 42 and 30.3% for the 2013 Elan 350, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2017 Lagoon 42 provides 10 berths in 4 cabins with 780L of water capacity and 400L of fuel. The 2013 Elan 350 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2013 Elan 350 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2017 Lagoon 42 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2017 Lagoon 42 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2017 Lagoon 42 · 2013 Elan 350