2019 Amel 60 vs 1996 MacGregor 65 — Comparison
1996 MacGregor 65
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 2019 Amel 60 | 1996 MacGregor 65 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Amel | MacGregor |
| Year | 2019 | 1996–2010 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | France | USA |
| Designer | Olivier Racoupeau | Roger MacGregor |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 18.40 m (60.4 ft) | 19.81 m (65.0 ft) |
| LWL | 16.00 m (52.5 ft) | 16.15 m (53.0 ft) |
| Beam | 5.10 m (16.7 ft) | 5.18 m (17.0 ft) |
| Draft | 2.30 m (7.5 ft) | 1.22 m (4.0 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 25,000 kg (55,116 lbs) | 15,876 kg (35,001 lbs) |
| Ballast | 8,500 kg (18,739 lbs) | 5,443 kg (12,000 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 150.0 m² (1,615 ft²) | 120.0 m² (1,292 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Centerboard |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 150 HP | 75 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 800 L (211.3 gal) | 380 L (100.4 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 1000 L (264.2 gal) | 760 L (200.8 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 7 | 8 |
| Cabins | 3 | 4 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 2019 Amel 60 and 1996 MacGregor 65 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2019 Amel 60 is a modern design by Amel from France, while the 1996 MacGregor 65 is a 1990s offering from MacGregor from USA. The 2019 Amel 60 was penned by Olivier Racoupeau. The 1996 MacGregor 65 was designed by Roger MacGregor.
In terms of size, the 2019 Amel 60 measures 18.40m (60.4ft) overall with a beam of 5.10m, compared to the 1996 MacGregor 65 at 19.81m (65.0ft) with a 5.18m beam. The 1996 MacGregor 65 is 1.41m longer than the 2019 Amel 60. The 2019 Amel 60 displaces approximately 57% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 2019 Amel 60 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.82 and 150.0 m² of sail area. The 1996 MacGregor 65, with an SA/D of 19.30 and 120.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1996 MacGregor 65 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 2019 Amel 60 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 15.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.70). The 1996 MacGregor 65 has a comfort ratio of 9.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.83. The ballast ratios are 34.0% for the 2019 Amel 60 and 34.3% for the 1996 MacGregor 65, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 2019 Amel 60 provides 7 berths in 3 cabins with 1000L of water capacity and 800L of fuel. The 1996 MacGregor 65 offers 8 berths in 4 cabins with 760L water and 380L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 2019 Amel 60 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1996 MacGregor 65 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1996 MacGregor 65 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 2019 Amel 60 · 1996 MacGregor 65