1965 Pearson Vanguard vs 2010 Elan 340 — Comparison

1965 Pearson Vanguard1965 Pearson Vanguard
VS
2010 Elan 3402010 Elan 340

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1965 Pearson Vanguard2010 Elan 340
General
ManufacturerPearsonElan
Year1965–19722010–2014
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSASlovenia
DesignerPhilip RhodesRob Humphreys
Dimensions
LOA9.83 m (32.3 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
LWL7.01 m (23.0 ft)9.00 m (29.5 ft)
Beam2.84 m (9.3 ft)3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft1.22 m (4.0 ft)1.95 m (6.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,082 kg (8,999 lbs)5,800 kg (12,787 lbs)
Ballast1,678 kg (3,699 lbs)1,750 kg (3,858 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area36.0 m² (388 ft²)55.0 m² (592 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine10 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity38 L (10.0 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)160 L (42.3 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1965 Pearson Vanguard
14.32
2010 Elan 340
17.31
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1965 Pearson Vanguard
41.11
2010 Elan 340
30.17
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1965 Pearson Vanguard
0.71
2010 Elan 340
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1965 Pearson Vanguard
25.31
2010 Elan 340
19.73

Detailed Comparison

The 1965 Pearson Vanguard and 2010 Elan 340 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1965 Pearson Vanguard is a classic design by Pearson from USA, while the 2010 Elan 340 is a modern offering from Elan from Slovenia. The 1965 Pearson Vanguard was penned by Philip Rhodes. The 2010 Elan 340 was designed by Rob Humphreys.

In terms of size, the 1965 Pearson Vanguard measures 9.83m (32.3ft) overall with a beam of 2.84m, compared to the 2010 Elan 340 at 10.36m (34.0ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 2010 Elan 340 is 0.53m longer than the 1965 Pearson Vanguard. The 2010 Elan 340 displaces approximately 42% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1965 Pearson Vanguard has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.32 and 36.0 m² of sail area. The 2010 Elan 340, with an SA/D of 17.31 and 55.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2010 Elan 340 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1965 Pearson Vanguard offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 25.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.71). The 2010 Elan 340 has a comfort ratio of 19.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 41.1% for the 1965 Pearson Vanguard and 30.2% for the 2010 Elan 340, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1965 Pearson Vanguard provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The 2010 Elan 340 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 160L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1965 Pearson Vanguard is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2010 Elan 340 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2010 Elan 340 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1965 Pearson Vanguard · 2010 Elan 340