1968 Pearson 22 vs 1982 Freedom 28 — Comparison

1968 Pearson 22
VS
1982 Freedom 281982 Freedom 28

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1968 Pearson 221982 Freedom 28
General
ManufacturerPearsonFreedom
Year1968–19731982–1988
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerWilliam ShawGarry Hoyt
Dimensions
LOA6.71 m (22.0 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
LWL5.18 m (17.0 ft)7.01 m (23.0 ft)
Beam2.13 m (7.0 ft)2.84 m (9.3 ft)
Draft0.99 m (3.2 ft)1.14 m (3.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement1,134 kg (2,500 lbs)2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)
Ballast454 kg (1,001 lbs)907 kg (2,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area18.6 m² (200 ft²)29.0 m² (312 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine6 HP10 HP
Fuel Capacity19 L (5.0 gal)38 L (10.0 gal)
Water Capacity23 L (6.1 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths45
Cabins11

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1968 Pearson 22
17.39
1982 Freedom 28
16.02
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1968 Pearson 22
40.04
1982 Freedom 28
36.35
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1968 Pearson 22
0.82
1982 Freedom 28
0.84
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1968 Pearson 22
20.02
1982 Freedom 28
17.13

Detailed Comparison

The 1968 Pearson 22 and 1982 Freedom 28 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1968 Pearson 22 is a classic design by Pearson from USA, while the 1982 Freedom 28 is a 1980s offering from Freedom from USA. The 1968 Pearson 22 was penned by William Shaw. The 1982 Freedom 28 was designed by Garry Hoyt.

In terms of size, the 1968 Pearson 22 measures 6.71m (22.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.13m, compared to the 1982 Freedom 28 at 8.53m (28.0ft) with a 2.84m beam. The 1982 Freedom 28 is 1.82m longer than the 1968 Pearson 22. The 1982 Freedom 28 displaces approximately 120% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1968 Pearson 22 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.39 and 18.6 m² of sail area. The 1982 Freedom 28, with an SA/D of 16.02 and 29.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1968 Pearson 22 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1968 Pearson 22 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.82). The 1982 Freedom 28 has a comfort ratio of 17.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.84. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1968 Pearson 22 and 36.4% for the 1982 Freedom 28, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1968 Pearson 22 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 23L of water capacity and 19L of fuel. The 1982 Freedom 28 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L water and 38L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1968 Pearson 22 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1968 Pearson 22 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1982 Freedom 28 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1968 Pearson 22 · 1982 Freedom 28