1968 Pearson 26 vs 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 — Comparison
1968 Pearson 26
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1968 Pearson 26 | 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Pearson | Pacific Seacraft |
| Year | 1968–1975 | 1982–2005 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | USA |
| Designer | William Shaw | William Crealock |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 7.92 m (26.0 ft) | 8.23 m (27.0 ft) |
| LWL | 6.10 m (20.0 ft) | 6.55 m (21.5 ft) |
| Beam | 2.44 m (8.0 ft) | 2.64 m (8.7 ft) |
| Draft | 1.14 m (3.7 ft) | 1.14 m (3.7 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 2,041 kg (4,500 lbs) | 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs) |
| Ballast | 862 kg (1,900 lbs) | 1,361 kg (3,000 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 27.0 m² (291 ft²) | 30.5 m² (328 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Full |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 10 HP | 15 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 30 L (7.9 gal) | 45 L (11.9 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 38 L (10.0 gal) | 76 L (20.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 4 | 4 |
| Cabins | 1 | 1 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1968 Pearson 26 and 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1968 Pearson 26 is a classic design by Pearson from USA, while the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 is a 1980s offering from Pacific Seacraft from USA. The 1968 Pearson 26 was penned by William Shaw. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 was designed by William Crealock.
In terms of size, the 1968 Pearson 26 measures 7.92m (26.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.44m, compared to the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 at 8.23m (27.0ft) with a 2.64m beam. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 is 0.31m longer than the 1968 Pearson 26. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 displaces approximately 56% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1968 Pearson 26 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.06 and 27.0 m² of sail area. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27, with an SA/D of 14.35 and 30.5 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1968 Pearson 26 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1968 Pearson 26 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 has a comfort ratio of 26.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 42.2% for the 1968 Pearson 26 and 42.9% for the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1968 Pearson 26 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 38L of water capacity and 30L of fuel. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1968 Pearson 26 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1968 Pearson 26 · 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27