Catalina 315 vs 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 — Comparison

Catalina 315Catalina 315
VS
1982 Pacific Seacraft 27

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationCatalina 3151982 Pacific Seacraft 27
General
ManufacturerCatalinaPacific Seacraft
Year20141982–2005
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGerry DouglasWilliam Crealock
Dimensions
LOA9.45 m (31.0 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
LWL8.61 m (28.2 ft)6.55 m (21.5 ft)
Beam3.20 m (10.5 ft)2.64 m (8.7 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)1.14 m (3.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)
Ballast1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area44.0 m² (474 ft²)30.5 m² (328 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFull
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity132 L (34.9 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths54
Cabins11

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Catalina 315
16.32
1982 Pacific Seacraft 27
14.35
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Catalina 315
39.99
1982 Pacific Seacraft 27
42.87
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Catalina 315
0.77
1982 Pacific Seacraft 27
0.72
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Catalina 315
18.85
1982 Pacific Seacraft 27
26.91

Detailed Comparison

The Catalina 315 and 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Catalina 315 is a modern design by Catalina from USA, while the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 is a 1980s offering from Pacific Seacraft from USA. The Catalina 315 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 was designed by William Crealock.

In terms of size, the Catalina 315 measures 9.45m (31.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.20m, compared to the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 at 8.23m (27.0ft) with a 2.64m beam. The Catalina 315 is 1.22m longer than the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27. The Catalina 315 displaces approximately 43% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Catalina 315 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.32 and 44.0 m² of sail area. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27, with an SA/D of 14.35 and 30.5 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The Catalina 315 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Catalina 315 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 has a comfort ratio of 26.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the Catalina 315 and 42.9% for the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Catalina 315 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 132L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 315 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Catalina 315 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Catalina 315 · 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27