1970 Bristol 32 vs 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 — Comparison

1970 Bristol 321970 Bristol 32
VS
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1970 Bristol 321986 Pacific Seacraft 25
General
ManufacturerBristolPacific Seacraft
Year1970–19771986–2007
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerHalsey HerreshoffWilliam Crealock
Dimensions
LOA9.75 m (32.0 ft)7.62 m (25.0 ft)
LWL7.16 m (23.5 ft)5.94 m (19.5 ft)
Beam2.97 m (9.7 ft)2.44 m (8.0 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)
Ballast1,905 kg (4,200 lbs)953 kg (2,101 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area40.2 m² (433 ft²)24.0 m² (258 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFull
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP10 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)30 L (7.9 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths54
Cabins11

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1970 Bristol 32
14.91
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
14.13
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1970 Bristol 32
42.00
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
42.02
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1970 Bristol 32
0.72
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1970 Bristol 32
25.96
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
25.59

Detailed Comparison

The 1970 Bristol 32 and 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1970 Bristol 32 is a 1970s design by Bristol from USA, while the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 is a 1980s offering from Pacific Seacraft from USA. The 1970 Bristol 32 was penned by Halsey Herreshoff. The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 was designed by William Crealock.

In terms of size, the 1970 Bristol 32 measures 9.75m (32.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.97m, compared to the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 at 7.62m (25.0ft) with a 2.44m beam. The 1970 Bristol 32 is 2.13m longer than the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25. The 1970 Bristol 32 displaces approximately 100% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1970 Bristol 32 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.91 and 40.2 m² of sail area. The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25, with an SA/D of 14.13 and 24.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1970 Bristol 32 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1970 Bristol 32 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 26.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.72). The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 has a comfort ratio of 25.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 42.0% for the 1970 Bristol 32 and 42.0% for the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1970 Bristol 32 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 57L water and 30L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1970 Bristol 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1970 Bristol 32 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1970 Bristol 32 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1970 Bristol 32 · 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25