1970 Columbia 26 Mk II vs 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 — Comparison

1970 Columbia 26 Mk II
VS
1982 Pacific Seacraft 27

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1970 Columbia 26 Mk II1982 Pacific Seacraft 27
General
ManufacturerColumbiaPacific Seacraft
Year1970–19751982–2005
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerWilliam CrealockWilliam Crealock
Dimensions
LOA7.92 m (26.0 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
LWL6.25 m (20.5 ft)6.55 m (21.5 ft)
Beam2.44 m (8.0 ft)2.64 m (8.7 ft)
Draft1.22 m (4.0 ft)1.14 m (3.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement1,905 kg (4,200 lbs)3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)
Ballast726 kg (1,601 lbs)1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area26.2 m² (282 ft²)30.5 m² (328 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFull
Engine & Tanks
Engine10 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity23 L (6.1 gal)45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity38 L (10.0 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths54
Cabins11

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1970 Columbia 26 Mk II
17.33
1982 Pacific Seacraft 27
14.35
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1970 Columbia 26 Mk II
38.11
1982 Pacific Seacraft 27
42.87
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1970 Columbia 26 Mk II
0.79
1982 Pacific Seacraft 27
0.72
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1970 Columbia 26 Mk II
19.58
1982 Pacific Seacraft 27
26.91

Detailed Comparison

The 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II and 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II is a 1970s design by Columbia from USA, while the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 is a 1980s offering from Pacific Seacraft from USA. The 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II was penned by William Crealock. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 was designed by William Crealock.

In terms of size, the 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II measures 7.92m (26.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.44m, compared to the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 at 8.23m (27.0ft) with a 2.64m beam. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 is 0.31m longer than the 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 displaces approximately 67% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.33 and 26.2 m² of sail area. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27, with an SA/D of 14.35 and 30.5 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 has a comfort ratio of 26.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 38.1% for the 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II and 42.9% for the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 38L of water capacity and 23L of fuel. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II · 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27