1970 Columbia 26 Mk II vs 1990 Feeling 32 — Comparison
1990 Feeling 32
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II | 1990 Feeling 32 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Columbia | Feeling |
| Year | 1970–1975 | 1990–1998 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | France |
| Designer | William Crealock | Philippe Harlé |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 7.92 m (26.0 ft) | 9.85 m (32.3 ft) |
| LWL | 6.25 m (20.5 ft) | 8.20 m (26.9 ft) |
| Beam | 2.44 m (8.0 ft) | 3.15 m (10.3 ft) |
| Draft | 1.22 m (4.0 ft) | 1.50 m (4.9 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 1,905 kg (4,200 lbs) | 4,700 kg (10,362 lbs) |
| Ballast | 726 kg (1,601 lbs) | 1,700 kg (3,748 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 26.2 m² (282 ft²) | 40.0 m² (431 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 10 HP | 18 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 23 L (6.1 gal) | 60 L (15.9 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 38 L (10.0 gal) | 120 L (31.7 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 5 | 5 |
| Cabins | 1 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II and 1990 Feeling 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II is a 1970s design by Columbia from USA, while the 1990 Feeling 32 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II was penned by William Crealock. The 1990 Feeling 32 was designed by Philippe Harlé.
In terms of size, the 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II measures 7.92m (26.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.44m, compared to the 1990 Feeling 32 at 9.85m (32.3ft) with a 3.15m beam. The 1990 Feeling 32 is 1.93m longer than the 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II. The 1990 Feeling 32 displaces approximately 147% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.33 and 26.2 m² of sail area. The 1990 Feeling 32, with an SA/D of 14.49 and 40.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 1990 Feeling 32 has a comfort ratio of 20.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 38.1% for the 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II and 36.2% for the 1990 Feeling 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 38L of water capacity and 23L of fuel. The 1990 Feeling 32 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 120L water and 60L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1990 Feeling 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II · 1990 Feeling 32