1971 Ranger 26 vs Catalina 270 — Comparison

1971 Ranger 261971 Ranger 26
VS
Catalina 270Catalina 270

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1971 Ranger 26Catalina 270
General
ManufacturerRangerCatalina
Year1971–19761992–2002
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGary MullGerry Douglas
Dimensions
LOA7.92 m (26.0 ft)8.31 m (27.3 ft)
LWL6.40 m (21.0 ft)7.24 m (23.8 ft)
Beam2.62 m (8.6 ft)2.74 m (9.0 ft)
Draft1.22 m (4.0 ft)1.47 m (4.8 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)2,313 kg (5,099 lbs)
Ballast907 kg (2,000 lbs)907 kg (2,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area29.5 m² (318 ft²)31.0 m² (334 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine10 HP12 HP
Fuel Capacity30 L (7.9 gal)45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity45 L (11.9 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths55
Cabins11

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1971 Ranger 26
17.85
Catalina 270
18.01
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1971 Ranger 26
41.66
Catalina 270
39.21
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1971 Ranger 26
0.81
Catalina 270
0.83
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1971 Ranger 26
19.73
Catalina 270
16.24

Detailed Comparison

The 1971 Ranger 26 and Catalina 270 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1971 Ranger 26 is a 1970s design by Ranger from USA, while the Catalina 270 is a 1990s offering from Catalina from USA. The 1971 Ranger 26 was penned by Gary Mull. The Catalina 270 was designed by Gerry Douglas.

In terms of size, the 1971 Ranger 26 measures 7.92m (26.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.62m, compared to the Catalina 270 at 8.31m (27.3ft) with a 2.74m beam. The Catalina 270 is 0.39m longer than the 1971 Ranger 26. The Catalina 270 displaces approximately 6% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1971 Ranger 26 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.85 and 29.5 m² of sail area. The Catalina 270, with an SA/D of 18.01 and 31.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Catalina 270 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1971 Ranger 26 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.81). The Catalina 270 has a comfort ratio of 16.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.83. The ballast ratios are 41.7% for the 1971 Ranger 26 and 39.2% for the Catalina 270, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1971 Ranger 26 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 45L of water capacity and 30L of fuel. The Catalina 270 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 68L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1971 Ranger 26 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 270 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1971 Ranger 26 · Catalina 270