1974 C&C 35 Mk II vs 1972 Contest 31 — Comparison

1974 C&C 35 Mk II
VS
1972 Contest 311972 Contest 31

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1974 C&C 35 Mk II1972 Contest 31
General
ManufacturerC&C YachtsContest
Year1974–19791972–1982
TypeSloopSloop
CountryCanadaNetherlands
DesignerCuthbertson & CassianDick Zaal
Dimensions
LOA10.67 m (35.0 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
LWL8.23 m (27.0 ft)7.62 m (25.0 ft)
Beam3.25 m (10.7 ft)3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,216 kg (11,499 lbs)4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area51.1 m² (550 ft²)39.5 m² (425 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassSteel
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)150 L (39.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1974 C&C 35 Mk II
17.26
1972 Contest 31
14.65
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1974 C&C 35 Mk II
43.48
1972 Contest 31
39.99
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1974 C&C 35 Mk II
0.75
1972 Contest 31
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1974 C&C 35 Mk II
20.76
1972 Contest 31
23.65

Detailed Comparison

The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II and 1972 Contest 31 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II is a 1970s design by C&C Yachts from Canada, while the 1972 Contest 31 is a 1970s offering from Contest from Netherlands. The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II was penned by Cuthbertson & Cassian. The 1972 Contest 31 was designed by Dick Zaal.

In terms of size, the 1974 C&C 35 Mk II measures 10.67m (35.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.25m, compared to the 1972 Contest 31 at 9.45m (31.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II is 1.22m longer than the 1972 Contest 31. The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II displaces approximately 15% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1974 C&C 35 Mk II has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.26 and 51.1 m² of sail area. The 1972 Contest 31, with an SA/D of 14.65 and 39.5 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1974 C&C 35 Mk II offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1972 Contest 31 has a comfort ratio of 23.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 43.5% for the 1974 C&C 35 Mk II and 40.0% for the 1972 Contest 31, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1974 C&C 35 Mk II provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The 1972 Contest 31 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 150L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1972 Contest 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1974 C&C 35 Mk II · 1972 Contest 31