1977 Westerly Centaur vs 1990 Feeling 32 — Comparison

1977 Westerly Centaur
VS
1990 Feeling 321990 Feeling 32

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1977 Westerly Centaur1990 Feeling 32
General
ManufacturerWesterlyFeeling
Year1977–19811990–1998
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUKFrance
DesignerLaurent GilesPhilippe Harlé
Dimensions
LOA7.92 m (26.0 ft)9.85 m (32.3 ft)
LWL6.40 m (21.0 ft)8.20 m (26.9 ft)
Beam2.69 m (8.8 ft)3.15 m (10.3 ft)
Draft1.07 m (3.5 ft)1.50 m (4.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)4,700 kg (10,362 lbs)
Ballast1,089 kg (2,401 lbs)1,700 kg (3,748 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area26.9 m² (290 ft²)40.0 m² (431 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeBilgeFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine13 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity45 L (11.9 gal)60 L (15.9 gal)
Water Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths55
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1977 Westerly Centaur
14.02
1990 Feeling 32
14.49
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1977 Westerly Centaur
40.01
1990 Feeling 32
36.17
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1977 Westerly Centaur
0.77
1990 Feeling 32
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1977 Westerly Centaur
23.82
1990 Feeling 32
20.72

Detailed Comparison

The 1977 Westerly Centaur and 1990 Feeling 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1977 Westerly Centaur is a 1970s design by Westerly from UK, while the 1990 Feeling 32 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The 1977 Westerly Centaur was penned by Laurent Giles. The 1990 Feeling 32 was designed by Philippe Harlé.

In terms of size, the 1977 Westerly Centaur measures 7.92m (26.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.69m, compared to the 1990 Feeling 32 at 9.85m (32.3ft) with a 3.15m beam. The 1990 Feeling 32 is 1.93m longer than the 1977 Westerly Centaur. The 1990 Feeling 32 displaces approximately 73% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1977 Westerly Centaur has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.02 and 26.9 m² of sail area. The 1990 Feeling 32, with an SA/D of 14.49 and 40.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1990 Feeling 32 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1977 Westerly Centaur offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 23.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1990 Feeling 32 has a comfort ratio of 20.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1977 Westerly Centaur and 36.2% for the 1990 Feeling 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1977 Westerly Centaur provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 68L of water capacity and 45L of fuel. The 1990 Feeling 32 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 120L water and 60L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1977 Westerly Centaur is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1990 Feeling 32 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1977 Westerly Centaur · 1990 Feeling 32