1978 Cape Dory 25 vs Hunter 280 — Comparison

1978 Cape Dory 25
VS
Hunter 280Hunter 280

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1978 Cape Dory 25Hunter 280
General
ManufacturerCape DoryHunter
Year1978–19831998–2003
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerCarl AlbergGlenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA7.62 m (25.0 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
LWL5.79 m (19.0 ft)7.47 m (24.5 ft)
Beam2.44 m (8.0 ft)2.82 m (9.3 ft)
Draft1.07 m (3.5 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)2,585 kg (5,699 lbs)
Ballast862 kg (1,900 lbs)998 kg (2,200 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area25.0 m² (269 ft²)34.0 m² (366 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine10 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity30 L (7.9 gal)45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths45
Cabins11

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1978 Cape Dory 25
15.79
Hunter 280
18.35
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1978 Cape Dory 25
42.23
Hunter 280
38.61
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1978 Cape Dory 25
0.77
Hunter 280
0.82
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1978 Cape Dory 25
23.80
Hunter 280
16.46

Detailed Comparison

The 1978 Cape Dory 25 and Hunter 280 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1978 Cape Dory 25 is a 1970s design by Cape Dory from USA, while the Hunter 280 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1978 Cape Dory 25 was penned by Carl Alberg. The Hunter 280 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the 1978 Cape Dory 25 measures 7.62m (25.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.44m, compared to the Hunter 280 at 8.53m (28.0ft) with a 2.82m beam. The Hunter 280 is 0.91m longer than the 1978 Cape Dory 25. The Hunter 280 displaces approximately 27% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1978 Cape Dory 25 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.79 and 25.0 m² of sail area. The Hunter 280, with an SA/D of 18.35 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 280 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1978 Cape Dory 25 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 23.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The Hunter 280 has a comfort ratio of 16.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.82. The ballast ratios are 42.2% for the 1978 Cape Dory 25 and 38.6% for the Hunter 280, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1978 Cape Dory 25 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 30L of fuel. The Hunter 280 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1978 Cape Dory 25 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 280 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hunter 280 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1978 Cape Dory 25 · Hunter 280