1979 Irwin 25 vs 1983 Irwin 32 — Comparison

1979 Irwin 251979 Irwin 25
VS
1983 Irwin 32

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1979 Irwin 251983 Irwin 32
General
ManufacturerIrwinIrwin
Year1979–19841983–1988
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerTed IrwinTed Irwin
Dimensions
LOA7.62 m (25.0 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL6.10 m (20.0 ft)8.08 m (26.5 ft)
Beam2.59 m (8.5 ft)3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft1.14 m (3.7 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)
Ballast816 kg (1,799 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area25.8 m² (278 ft²)41.0 m² (441 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine10 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity30 L (7.9 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity38 L (10.0 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1979 Irwin 25
16.30
1983 Irwin 32
14.27
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1979 Irwin 25
39.98
1983 Irwin 32
40.90
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1979 Irwin 25
0.82
1983 Irwin 32
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1979 Irwin 25
20.55
1983 Irwin 32
22.12

Detailed Comparison

The 1979 Irwin 25 and 1983 Irwin 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1979 Irwin 25 is a 1970s design by Irwin from USA, while the 1983 Irwin 32 is a 1980s offering from Irwin from USA. The 1979 Irwin 25 was penned by Ted Irwin. The 1983 Irwin 32 was designed by Ted Irwin.

In terms of size, the 1979 Irwin 25 measures 7.62m (25.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.59m, compared to the 1983 Irwin 32 at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The 1983 Irwin 32 is 2.13m longer than the 1979 Irwin 25. The 1983 Irwin 32 displaces approximately 144% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1979 Irwin 25 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.30 and 25.8 m² of sail area. The 1983 Irwin 32, with an SA/D of 14.27 and 41.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1979 Irwin 25 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1979 Irwin 25 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.82). The 1983 Irwin 32 has a comfort ratio of 22.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1979 Irwin 25 and 40.9% for the 1983 Irwin 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1979 Irwin 25 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 38L of water capacity and 30L of fuel. The 1983 Irwin 32 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1983 Irwin 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1979 Irwin 25 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1983 Irwin 32 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1979 Irwin 25 · 1983 Irwin 32