1979 Tartan 30 vs Hanse 320 — Comparison

1979 Tartan 301979 Tartan 30
VS
Hanse 320Hanse 320

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1979 Tartan 30Hanse 320
General
ManufacturerTartanHanse
Year1979–19842005–2010
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAGermany
DesignerSparkman & Stephensjudel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA9.14 m (30.0 ft)9.92 m (32.5 ft)
LWL7.16 m (23.5 ft)8.80 m (28.9 ft)
Beam3.05 m (10.0 ft)3.28 m (10.8 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.70 m (5.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,082 kg (8,999 lbs)4,600 kg (10,141 lbs)
Ballast1,678 kg (3,699 lbs)1,400 kg (3,086 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area38.6 m² (416 ft²)46.0 m² (495 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)90 L (23.8 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)150 L (39.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1979 Tartan 30
15.36
Hanse 320
16.90
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1979 Tartan 30
41.11
Hanse 320
30.43
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1979 Tartan 30
0.76
Hanse 320
0.79
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1979 Tartan 30
23.62
Hanse 320
17.40

Detailed Comparison

The 1979 Tartan 30 and Hanse 320 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1979 Tartan 30 is a 1970s design by Tartan from USA, while the Hanse 320 is a 2000s offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1979 Tartan 30 was penned by Sparkman & Stephens. The Hanse 320 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the 1979 Tartan 30 measures 9.14m (30.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the Hanse 320 at 9.92m (32.5ft) with a 3.28m beam. The Hanse 320 is 0.78m longer than the 1979 Tartan 30. The Hanse 320 displaces approximately 13% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1979 Tartan 30 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.36 and 38.6 m² of sail area. The Hanse 320, with an SA/D of 16.90 and 46.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hanse 320 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1979 Tartan 30 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 23.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The Hanse 320 has a comfort ratio of 17.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.79. The ballast ratios are 41.1% for the 1979 Tartan 30 and 30.4% for the Hanse 320, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1979 Tartan 30 provides 6 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The Hanse 320 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L water and 90L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1979 Tartan 30 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 320 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1979 Tartan 30 · Hanse 320