1980 Peterson 34 vs 1983 Pearson 31 — Comparison

1980 Peterson 34
VS
1983 Pearson 311983 Pearson 31

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1980 Peterson 341983 Pearson 31
General
ManufacturerPetersonPearson
Year1980–19861983–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerDoug PetersonWilliam Shaw
Dimensions
LOA10.36 m (34.0 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
LWL8.53 m (28.0 ft)7.77 m (25.5 ft)
Beam3.28 m (10.8 ft)3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,216 kg (11,499 lbs)4,309 kg (9,500 lbs)
Ballast2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area51.1 m² (550 ft²)40.0 m² (431 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1980 Peterson 34
17.26
1983 Pearson 31
15.35
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1980 Peterson 34
43.48
1983 Pearson 31
42.10
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1980 Peterson 34
0.76
1983 Pearson 31
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1980 Peterson 34
19.98
1983 Pearson 31
21.43

Detailed Comparison

The 1980 Peterson 34 and 1983 Pearson 31 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1980 Peterson 34 is a 1980s design by Peterson from USA, while the 1983 Pearson 31 is a 1980s offering from Pearson from USA. The 1980 Peterson 34 was penned by Doug Peterson. The 1983 Pearson 31 was designed by William Shaw.

In terms of size, the 1980 Peterson 34 measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the 1983 Pearson 31 at 9.45m (31.0ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 1980 Peterson 34 is 0.91m longer than the 1983 Pearson 31. The 1980 Peterson 34 displaces approximately 21% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1980 Peterson 34 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.26 and 51.1 m² of sail area. The 1983 Pearson 31, with an SA/D of 15.35 and 40.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1980 Peterson 34 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1980 Peterson 34 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 20.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1983 Pearson 31 has a comfort ratio of 21.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 43.5% for the 1980 Peterson 34 and 42.1% for the 1983 Pearson 31, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1980 Peterson 34 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1983 Pearson 31 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1983 Pearson 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1980 Peterson 34 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1980 Peterson 34 · 1983 Pearson 31