1982 S2 7.9 vs Catalina 270 — Comparison

1982 S2 7.9
VS
Catalina 270Catalina 270

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1982 S2 7.9Catalina 270
General
ManufacturerS2Catalina
Year1982–19881992–2002
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerArthur EdmundsGerry Douglas
Dimensions
LOA7.90 m (25.9 ft)8.31 m (27.3 ft)
LWL6.71 m (22.0 ft)7.24 m (23.8 ft)
Beam2.84 m (9.3 ft)2.74 m (9.0 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)1.47 m (4.8 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)2,313 kg (5,099 lbs)
Ballast907 kg (2,000 lbs)907 kg (2,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area31.6 m² (340 ft²)31.0 m² (334 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine10 HP12 HP
Fuel Capacity38 L (10.0 gal)45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths55
Cabins11

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1982 S2 7.9
18.61
Catalina 270
18.01
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1982 S2 7.9
39.99
Catalina 270
39.21
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1982 S2 7.9
0.87
Catalina 270
0.83
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1982 S2 7.9
17.38
Catalina 270
16.24

Detailed Comparison

The 1982 S2 7.9 and Catalina 270 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1982 S2 7.9 is a 1980s design by S2 from USA, while the Catalina 270 is a 1990s offering from Catalina from USA. The 1982 S2 7.9 was penned by Arthur Edmunds. The Catalina 270 was designed by Gerry Douglas.

In terms of size, the 1982 S2 7.9 measures 7.90m (25.9ft) overall with a beam of 2.84m, compared to the Catalina 270 at 8.31m (27.3ft) with a 2.74m beam. The Catalina 270 is 0.41m longer than the 1982 S2 7.9. The Catalina 270 displaces approximately 2% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1982 S2 7.9 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.61 and 31.6 m² of sail area. The Catalina 270, with an SA/D of 18.01 and 31.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1982 S2 7.9 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1982 S2 7.9 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.87). The Catalina 270 has a comfort ratio of 16.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.83. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1982 S2 7.9 and 39.2% for the Catalina 270, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1982 S2 7.9 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The Catalina 270 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 68L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 S2 7.9 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1982 S2 7.9 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1982 S2 7.9 · Catalina 270