1982 Westerly Konsort vs 1974 O'Day 23 — Comparison

1982 Westerly Konsort1982 Westerly Konsort
VS
1974 O'Day 231974 O'Day 23

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1982 Westerly Konsort1974 O'Day 23
General
ManufacturerWesterlyO'Day
Year1982–19901974–1983
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUKUSA
DesignerEd DuboisC. Raymond Hunt
Dimensions
LOA9.50 m (31.2 ft)6.93 m (22.7 ft)
LWL7.70 m (25.3 ft)5.79 m (19.0 ft)
Beam3.10 m (10.2 ft)2.24 m (7.3 ft)
Draft1.07 m (3.5 ft)1.02 m (3.3 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)816 kg (1,799 lbs)
Ballast1,633 kg (3,600 lbs)295 kg (650 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area34.0 m² (366 ft²)17.5 m² (188 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeBilgeFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP5 HP
Fuel Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)11 L (2.9 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)15 L (4.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths64
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1982 Westerly Konsort
12.61
1974 O'Day 23
20.38
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1982 Westerly Konsort
36.00
1974 O'Day 23
36.15
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1982 Westerly Konsort
0.75
1974 O'Day 23
0.96
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1982 Westerly Konsort
22.75
1974 O'Day 23
11.39

Detailed Comparison

The 1982 Westerly Konsort and 1974 O'Day 23 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1982 Westerly Konsort is a 1980s design by Westerly from UK, while the 1974 O'Day 23 is a 1970s offering from O'Day from USA. The 1982 Westerly Konsort was penned by Ed Dubois. The 1974 O'Day 23 was designed by C. Raymond Hunt.

In terms of size, the 1982 Westerly Konsort measures 9.50m (31.2ft) overall with a beam of 3.10m, compared to the 1974 O'Day 23 at 6.93m (22.7ft) with a 2.24m beam. The 1982 Westerly Konsort is 2.57m longer than the 1974 O'Day 23. The 1982 Westerly Konsort displaces approximately 456% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1982 Westerly Konsort has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 12.61 and 34.0 m² of sail area. The 1974 O'Day 23, with an SA/D of 20.38 and 17.5 m² of canvas, offers generous sail power for spirited sailing. The 1974 O'Day 23 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1982 Westerly Konsort offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1974 O'Day 23 has a comfort ratio of 11.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.96. The ballast ratios are 36.0% for the 1982 Westerly Konsort and 36.2% for the 1974 O'Day 23, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1982 Westerly Konsort provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The 1974 O'Day 23 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 15L water and 11L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 Westerly Konsort is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1974 O'Day 23 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1982 Westerly Konsort offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1982 Westerly Konsort · 1974 O'Day 23