1982 Westerly Konsort vs 1976 C&C 33 — Comparison

1982 Westerly Konsort1982 Westerly Konsort
VS
1976 C&C 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1982 Westerly Konsort1976 C&C 33
General
ManufacturerWesterlyC&C Yachts
Year1982–19901976–1982
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUKCanada
DesignerEd DuboisCuthbertson & Cassian
Dimensions
LOA9.50 m (31.2 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL7.70 m (25.3 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam3.10 m (10.2 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft1.07 m (3.5 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast1,633 kg (3,600 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area34.0 m² (366 ft²)42.0 m² (452 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeBilgeFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1982 Westerly Konsort
12.61
1976 C&C 33
15.57
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1982 Westerly Konsort
36.00
1976 C&C 33
45.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1982 Westerly Konsort
0.75
1976 C&C 33
0.81
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1982 Westerly Konsort
22.75
1976 C&C 33
18.07

Detailed Comparison

The 1982 Westerly Konsort and 1976 C&C 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1982 Westerly Konsort is a 1980s design by Westerly from UK, while the 1976 C&C 33 is a 1970s offering from C&C Yachts from Canada. The 1982 Westerly Konsort was penned by Ed Dubois. The 1976 C&C 33 was designed by Cuthbertson & Cassian.

In terms of size, the 1982 Westerly Konsort measures 9.50m (31.2ft) overall with a beam of 3.10m, compared to the 1976 C&C 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1976 C&C 33 is 0.56m longer than the 1982 Westerly Konsort.

Looking at performance, the 1982 Westerly Konsort has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 12.61 and 34.0 m² of sail area. The 1976 C&C 33, with an SA/D of 15.57 and 42.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1976 C&C 33 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1982 Westerly Konsort offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1976 C&C 33 has a comfort ratio of 18.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.81. The ballast ratios are 36.0% for the 1982 Westerly Konsort and 45.0% for the 1976 C&C 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1982 Westerly Konsort provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The 1976 C&C 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 Westerly Konsort is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1976 C&C 33 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1982 Westerly Konsort · 1976 C&C 33