1984 J/29 vs 2013 Elan 350 — Comparison

1984 J/29
VS
2013 Elan 350

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1984 J/292013 Elan 350
General
ManufacturerJ/BoatsElan
Year1984–19902013–2018
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSASlovenia
DesignerRod JohnstoneRob Humphreys
Dimensions
LOA8.99 m (29.5 ft)10.67 m (35.0 ft)
LWL7.62 m (25.0 ft)9.30 m (30.5 ft)
Beam3.28 m (10.8 ft)3.46 m (11.4 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)2.00 m (6.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,266 kg (7,200 lbs)6,100 kg (13,448 lbs)
Ballast1,497 kg (3,300 lbs)1,850 kg (4,079 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area41.1 m² (442 ft²)58.0 m² (624 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine10 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity38 L (10.0 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity38 L (10.0 gal)170 L (44.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1984 J/29
18.97
2013 Elan 350
17.65
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1984 J/29
45.84
2013 Elan 350
30.33
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1984 J/29
0.89
2013 Elan 350
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1984 J/29
15.99
2013 Elan 350
19.02

Detailed Comparison

The 1984 J/29 and 2013 Elan 350 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1984 J/29 is a 1980s design by J/Boats from USA, while the 2013 Elan 350 is a modern offering from Elan from Slovenia. The 1984 J/29 was penned by Rod Johnstone. The 2013 Elan 350 was designed by Rob Humphreys.

In terms of size, the 1984 J/29 measures 8.99m (29.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the 2013 Elan 350 at 10.67m (35.0ft) with a 3.46m beam. The 2013 Elan 350 is 1.68m longer than the 1984 J/29. The 2013 Elan 350 displaces approximately 87% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1984 J/29 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.97 and 41.1 m² of sail area. The 2013 Elan 350, with an SA/D of 17.65 and 58.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1984 J/29 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1984 J/29 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.89). The 2013 Elan 350 has a comfort ratio of 19.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 45.8% for the 1984 J/29 and 30.3% for the 2013 Elan 350, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1984 J/29 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 38L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The 2013 Elan 350 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2013 Elan 350 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1984 J/29 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2013 Elan 350 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1984 J/29 · 2013 Elan 350