1985 Valiant 37 vs 2000 Valiant 50 — Comparison

1985 Valiant 371985 Valiant 37
VS
2000 Valiant 502000 Valiant 50

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1985 Valiant 372000 Valiant 50
General
ManufacturerValiantValiant
Year1985–19952000–2008
TypeCutterCutter
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerBob PerryBob Perry
Dimensions
LOA11.28 m (37.0 ft)15.24 m (50.0 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)12.50 m (41.0 ft)
Beam3.47 m (11.4 ft)4.35 m (14.3 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,711 kg (17,000 lbs)16,330 kg (36,001 lbs)
Ballast3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)6,350 kg (13,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area60.5 m² (651 ft²)102.0 m² (1,098 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeModified fullModified full
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP100 HP
Fuel Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)340 L (89.8 gal)
Water Capacity265 L (70.0 gal)568 L (150.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths68
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1985 Valiant 37
15.75
2000 Valiant 50
16.10
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1985 Valiant 37
41.17
2000 Valiant 50
38.89
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1985 Valiant 37
0.70
2000 Valiant 50
0.69
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1985 Valiant 37
23.61
2000 Valiant 50
19.94

Detailed Comparison

The 1985 Valiant 37 and 2000 Valiant 50 represent two takes on cutter-rigged sailing. The 1985 Valiant 37 is a 1980s design by Valiant from USA, while the 2000 Valiant 50 is a 2000s offering from Valiant from USA. The 1985 Valiant 37 was penned by Bob Perry. The 2000 Valiant 50 was designed by Bob Perry.

In terms of size, the 1985 Valiant 37 measures 11.28m (37.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.47m, compared to the 2000 Valiant 50 at 15.24m (50.0ft) with a 4.35m beam. The 2000 Valiant 50 is 3.96m longer than the 1985 Valiant 37. The 2000 Valiant 50 displaces approximately 112% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1985 Valiant 37 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.75 and 60.5 m² of sail area. The 2000 Valiant 50, with an SA/D of 16.10 and 102.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2000 Valiant 50 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1985 Valiant 37 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 23.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.70). The 2000 Valiant 50 has a comfort ratio of 19.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.69. The ballast ratios are 41.2% for the 1985 Valiant 37 and 38.9% for the 2000 Valiant 50, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1985 Valiant 37 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 265L of water capacity and 151L of fuel. The 2000 Valiant 50 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 568L water and 340L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1985 Valiant 37 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2000 Valiant 50 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2000 Valiant 50 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1985 Valiant 37 · 2000 Valiant 50