1994 Passport 42 vs 2000 Valiant 50 — Comparison

1994 Passport 421994 Passport 42
VS
2000 Valiant 502000 Valiant 50

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1994 Passport 422000 Valiant 50
General
ManufacturerPassportValiant
Year1994–20032000–2008
TypeCutterCutter
CountryTaiwanUSA
DesignerRobert PerryBob Perry
Dimensions
LOA12.80 m (42.0 ft)15.24 m (50.0 ft)
LWL10.36 m (34.0 ft)12.50 m (41.0 ft)
Beam3.86 m (12.7 ft)4.35 m (14.3 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement10,886 kg (23,999 lbs)16,330 kg (36,001 lbs)
Ballast4,309 kg (9,500 lbs)6,350 kg (13,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area75.3 m² (811 ft²)102.0 m² (1,098 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeModified fullModified full
Engine & Tanks
Engine55 HP100 HP
Fuel Capacity227 L (60.0 gal)340 L (89.8 gal)
Water Capacity454 L (119.9 gal)568 L (150.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths78
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1994 Passport 42
15.57
2000 Valiant 50
16.10
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1994 Passport 42
39.58
2000 Valiant 50
38.89
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1994 Passport 42
0.70
2000 Valiant 50
0.69
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1994 Passport 42
22.49
2000 Valiant 50
19.94

Detailed Comparison

The 1994 Passport 42 and 2000 Valiant 50 represent two takes on cutter-rigged sailing. The 1994 Passport 42 is a 1990s design by Passport from Taiwan, while the 2000 Valiant 50 is a 2000s offering from Valiant from USA. The 1994 Passport 42 was penned by Robert Perry. The 2000 Valiant 50 was designed by Bob Perry.

In terms of size, the 1994 Passport 42 measures 12.80m (42.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.86m, compared to the 2000 Valiant 50 at 15.24m (50.0ft) with a 4.35m beam. The 2000 Valiant 50 is 2.44m longer than the 1994 Passport 42. The 2000 Valiant 50 displaces approximately 50% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1994 Passport 42 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.57 and 75.3 m² of sail area. The 2000 Valiant 50, with an SA/D of 16.10 and 102.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2000 Valiant 50 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1994 Passport 42 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.70). The 2000 Valiant 50 has a comfort ratio of 19.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.69. The ballast ratios are 39.6% for the 1994 Passport 42 and 38.9% for the 2000 Valiant 50, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1994 Passport 42 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 454L of water capacity and 227L of fuel. The 2000 Valiant 50 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 568L water and 340L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1994 Passport 42 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2000 Valiant 50 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2000 Valiant 50 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1994 Passport 42 · 2000 Valiant 50