1986 J/28 vs 1974 O'Day 23 — Comparison

1986 J/28
VS
1974 O'Day 231974 O'Day 23

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1986 J/281974 O'Day 23
General
ManufacturerJ/BoatsO'Day
Year1986–19901974–1983
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerRod JohnstoneC. Raymond Hunt
Dimensions
LOA8.66 m (28.4 ft)6.93 m (22.7 ft)
LWL7.32 m (24.0 ft)5.79 m (19.0 ft)
Beam3.05 m (10.0 ft)2.24 m (7.3 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)1.02 m (3.3 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,948 kg (6,499 lbs)816 kg (1,799 lbs)
Ballast1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)295 kg (650 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area37.6 m² (405 ft²)17.5 m² (188 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine12 HP5 HP
Fuel Capacity38 L (10.0 gal)11 L (2.9 gal)
Water Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)15 L (4.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths54
Cabins11

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1986 J/28
18.59
1974 O'Day 23
20.38
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1986 J/28
46.17
1974 O'Day 23
36.15
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1986 J/28
0.85
1974 O'Day 23
0.96
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1986 J/28
17.20
1974 O'Day 23
11.39

Detailed Comparison

The 1986 J/28 and 1974 O'Day 23 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1986 J/28 is a 1980s design by J/Boats from USA, while the 1974 O'Day 23 is a 1970s offering from O'Day from USA. The 1986 J/28 was penned by Rod Johnstone. The 1974 O'Day 23 was designed by C. Raymond Hunt.

In terms of size, the 1986 J/28 measures 8.66m (28.4ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the 1974 O'Day 23 at 6.93m (22.7ft) with a 2.24m beam. The 1986 J/28 is 1.73m longer than the 1974 O'Day 23. The 1986 J/28 displaces approximately 261% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1986 J/28 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.59 and 37.6 m² of sail area. The 1974 O'Day 23, with an SA/D of 20.38 and 17.5 m² of canvas, offers generous sail power for spirited sailing. The 1974 O'Day 23 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1986 J/28 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.85). The 1974 O'Day 23 has a comfort ratio of 11.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.96. The ballast ratios are 46.2% for the 1986 J/28 and 36.2% for the 1974 O'Day 23, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1986 J/28 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The 1974 O'Day 23 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 15L water and 11L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1986 J/28 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1974 O'Day 23 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1986 J/28 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1986 J/28 · 1974 O'Day 23