1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 vs 1974 O'Day 23 — Comparison

1990 Wauquiez Centurion 321990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
VS
1974 O'Day 231974 O'Day 23

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1990 Wauquiez Centurion 321974 O'Day 23
General
ManufacturerWauquiezO'Day
Year1990–19981974–1983
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFranceUSA
DesignerJean-Marie FinotC. Raymond Hunt
Dimensions
LOA9.75 m (32.0 ft)6.93 m (22.7 ft)
LWL8.23 m (27.0 ft)5.79 m (19.0 ft)
Beam3.15 m (10.3 ft)2.24 m (7.3 ft)
Draft1.65 m (5.4 ft)1.02 m (3.3 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,500 kg (9,921 lbs)816 kg (1,799 lbs)
Ballast1,800 kg (3,968 lbs)295 kg (650 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area42.0 m² (452 ft²)17.5 m² (188 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP5 HP
Fuel Capacity65 L (17.2 gal)11 L (2.9 gal)
Water Capacity120 L (31.7 gal)15 L (4.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths54
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
15.66
1974 O'Day 23
20.38
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
40.00
1974 O'Day 23
36.15
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
0.76
1974 O'Day 23
0.96
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
19.88
1974 O'Day 23
11.39

Detailed Comparison

The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 and 1974 O'Day 23 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 is a 1990s design by Wauquiez from France, while the 1974 O'Day 23 is a 1970s offering from O'Day from USA. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 was penned by Jean-Marie Finot. The 1974 O'Day 23 was designed by C. Raymond Hunt.

In terms of size, the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 measures 9.75m (32.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.15m, compared to the 1974 O'Day 23 at 6.93m (22.7ft) with a 2.24m beam. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 is 2.82m longer than the 1974 O'Day 23. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 displaces approximately 451% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.66 and 42.0 m² of sail area. The 1974 O'Day 23, with an SA/D of 20.38 and 17.5 m² of canvas, offers generous sail power for spirited sailing. The 1974 O'Day 23 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1974 O'Day 23 has a comfort ratio of 11.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.96. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 and 36.2% for the 1974 O'Day 23, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 120L of water capacity and 65L of fuel. The 1974 O'Day 23 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 15L water and 11L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1974 O'Day 23 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 · 1974 O'Day 23