1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 vs 1982 Westerly Konsort — Comparison

1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
VS
1982 Westerly Konsort1982 Westerly Konsort

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1986 Pacific Seacraft 251982 Westerly Konsort
General
ManufacturerPacific SeacraftWesterly
Year1986–20071982–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUK
DesignerWilliam CrealockEd Dubois
Dimensions
LOA7.62 m (25.0 ft)9.50 m (31.2 ft)
LWL5.94 m (19.5 ft)7.70 m (25.3 ft)
Beam2.44 m (8.0 ft)3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft1.07 m (3.5 ft)1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast953 kg (2,101 lbs)1,633 kg (3,600 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area24.0 m² (258 ft²)34.0 m² (366 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullBilge
Engine & Tanks
Engine10 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity30 L (7.9 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths46
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
14.13
1982 Westerly Konsort
12.61
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
42.02
1982 Westerly Konsort
36.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
0.74
1982 Westerly Konsort
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
25.59
1982 Westerly Konsort
22.75

Detailed Comparison

The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 and 1982 Westerly Konsort represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 is a 1980s design by Pacific Seacraft from USA, while the 1982 Westerly Konsort is a 1980s offering from Westerly from UK. The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 was penned by William Crealock. The 1982 Westerly Konsort was designed by Ed Dubois.

In terms of size, the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 measures 7.62m (25.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.44m, compared to the 1982 Westerly Konsort at 9.50m (31.2ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 1982 Westerly Konsort is 1.88m longer than the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25. The 1982 Westerly Konsort displaces approximately 100% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.13 and 24.0 m² of sail area. The 1982 Westerly Konsort, with an SA/D of 12.61 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 25.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1982 Westerly Konsort has a comfort ratio of 22.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 42.0% for the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 and 36.0% for the 1982 Westerly Konsort, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 30L of fuel. The 1982 Westerly Konsort offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1982 Westerly Konsort offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 · 1982 Westerly Konsort