1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 vs 1991 Westerly Seahawk — Comparison

1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
VS
1991 Westerly Seahawk1991 Westerly Seahawk

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1986 Pacific Seacraft 251991 Westerly Seahawk
General
ManufacturerPacific SeacraftWesterly
Year1986–20071991–1997
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUK
DesignerWilliam CrealockEd Dubois
Dimensions
LOA7.62 m (25.0 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
LWL5.94 m (19.5 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
Beam2.44 m (8.0 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft1.07 m (3.5 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)6,123 kg (13,499 lbs)
Ballast953 kg (2,101 lbs)2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area24.0 m² (258 ft²)48.0 m² (517 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine10 HP28 HP
Fuel Capacity30 L (7.9 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)220 L (58.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths47
Cabins13

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
14.13
1991 Westerly Seahawk
14.57
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
42.02
1991 Westerly Seahawk
40.75
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
0.74
1991 Westerly Seahawk
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
25.59
1991 Westerly Seahawk
22.81

Detailed Comparison

The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 and 1991 Westerly Seahawk represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 is a 1980s design by Pacific Seacraft from USA, while the 1991 Westerly Seahawk is a 1990s offering from Westerly from UK. The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 was penned by William Crealock. The 1991 Westerly Seahawk was designed by Ed Dubois.

In terms of size, the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 measures 7.62m (25.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.44m, compared to the 1991 Westerly Seahawk at 10.36m (34.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1991 Westerly Seahawk is 2.74m longer than the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25. The 1991 Westerly Seahawk displaces approximately 170% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.13 and 24.0 m² of sail area. The 1991 Westerly Seahawk, with an SA/D of 14.57 and 48.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1991 Westerly Seahawk has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 25.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1991 Westerly Seahawk has a comfort ratio of 22.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 42.0% for the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 and 40.8% for the 1991 Westerly Seahawk, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 30L of fuel. The 1991 Westerly Seahawk offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 220L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1991 Westerly Seahawk has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1991 Westerly Seahawk offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 · 1991 Westerly Seahawk