1988 C&C 32 vs Hanse 320 — Comparison
Hanse 320
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1988 C&C 32 | Hanse 320 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | C&C Yachts | Hanse |
| Year | 1988–1993 | 2005–2010 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Canada | Germany |
| Designer | Cuthbertson & Cassian | judel/vrolijk & co |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 9.75 m (32.0 ft) | 9.92 m (32.5 ft) |
| LWL | 8.23 m (27.0 ft) | 8.80 m (28.9 ft) |
| Beam | 3.28 m (10.8 ft) | 3.28 m (10.8 ft) |
| Draft | 1.83 m (6.0 ft) | 1.70 m (5.6 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 4,536 kg (10,000 lbs) | 4,600 kg (10,141 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,996 kg (4,400 lbs) | 1,400 kg (3,086 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 45.8 m² (493 ft²) | 46.0 m² (495 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 18 HP | 18 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 68 L (18.0 gal) | 90 L (23.8 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 114 L (30.1 gal) | 150 L (39.6 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 6 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1988 C&C 32 and Hanse 320 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1988 C&C 32 is a 1980s design by C&C Yachts from Canada, while the Hanse 320 is a 2000s offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1988 C&C 32 was penned by Cuthbertson & Cassian. The Hanse 320 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.
In terms of size, the 1988 C&C 32 measures 9.75m (32.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the Hanse 320 at 9.92m (32.5ft) with a 3.28m beam. The Hanse 320 is 0.17m longer than the 1988 C&C 32. The Hanse 320 displaces approximately 1% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1988 C&C 32 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.98 and 45.8 m² of sail area. The Hanse 320, with an SA/D of 16.90 and 46.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1988 C&C 32 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1988 C&C 32 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The Hanse 320 has a comfort ratio of 17.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.79. The ballast ratios are 44.0% for the 1988 C&C 32 and 30.4% for the Hanse 320, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1988 C&C 32 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The Hanse 320 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L water and 90L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1988 C&C 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1988 C&C 32 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1988 C&C 32 · Hanse 320