1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 vs 2000 Island Packet 38 — Comparison

1990 Pacific Seacraft 34
VS
2000 Island Packet 38

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1990 Pacific Seacraft 342000 Island Packet 38
General
ManufacturerPacific SeacraftIsland Packet
Year1990–20072000–2008
TypeCutterCutter
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerWilliam CrealockBob Johnson
Dimensions
LOA10.36 m (34.0 ft)11.58 m (38.0 ft)
LWL8.08 m (26.5 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
Beam3.20 m (10.5 ft)3.72 m (12.2 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement6,350 kg (13,999 lbs)8,618 kg (18,999 lbs)
Ballast2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)3,447 kg (7,599 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area51.5 m² (554 ft²)60.5 m² (651 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFull
Engine & Tanks
Engine28 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)189 L (49.9 gal)
Water Capacity227 L (60.0 gal)340 L (89.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1990 Pacific Seacraft 34
15.26
2000 Island Packet 38
14.62
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1990 Pacific Seacraft 34
42.87
2000 Island Packet 38
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1990 Pacific Seacraft 34
0.69
2000 Island Packet 38
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1990 Pacific Seacraft 34
26.98
2000 Island Packet 38
21.70

Detailed Comparison

The 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 and 2000 Island Packet 38 represent two takes on cutter-rigged sailing. The 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 is a 1990s design by Pacific Seacraft from USA, while the 2000 Island Packet 38 is a 2000s offering from Island Packet from USA. The 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 was penned by William Crealock. The 2000 Island Packet 38 was designed by Bob Johnson.

In terms of size, the 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.20m, compared to the 2000 Island Packet 38 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.72m beam. The 2000 Island Packet 38 is 1.22m longer than the 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34. The 2000 Island Packet 38 displaces approximately 36% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.26 and 51.5 m² of sail area. The 2000 Island Packet 38, with an SA/D of 14.62 and 60.5 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 27.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.69). The 2000 Island Packet 38 has a comfort ratio of 21.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 42.9% for the 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 and 40.0% for the 2000 Island Packet 38, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 227L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 2000 Island Packet 38 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 340L water and 189L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 · 2000 Island Packet 38