1992 Moody 41 vs 1998 Feeling 44 — Comparison
1992 Moody 41
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1992 Moody 41 | 1998 Feeling 44 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Moody | Feeling |
| Year | 1992–1998 | 1998–2005 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | UK | France |
| Designer | Bill Dixon | Philippe Harlé / Mortain & Mavrikios |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 12.50 m (41.0 ft) | 13.41 m (44.0 ft) |
| LWL | 10.36 m (34.0 ft) | 11.50 m (37.7 ft) |
| Beam | 3.86 m (12.7 ft) | 4.10 m (13.5 ft) |
| Draft | 1.70 m (5.6 ft) | 1.90 m (6.2 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 9,800 kg (21,605 lbs) | 10,500 kg (23,149 lbs) |
| Ballast | 3,800 kg (8,378 lbs) | 4,000 kg (8,818 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 70.0 m² (754 ft²) | 82.0 m² (883 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 40 HP | 55 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 180 L (47.6 gal) | 200 L (52.8 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 360 L (95.1 gal) | 400 L (105.7 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 7 | 8 |
| Cabins | 3 | 3 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1992 Moody 41 and 1998 Feeling 44 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1992 Moody 41 is a 1990s design by Moody from UK, while the 1998 Feeling 44 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The 1992 Moody 41 was penned by Bill Dixon. The 1998 Feeling 44 was designed by Philippe Harlé / Mortain & Mavrikios.
In terms of size, the 1992 Moody 41 measures 12.50m (41.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.86m, compared to the 1998 Feeling 44 at 13.41m (44.0ft) with a 4.10m beam. The 1998 Feeling 44 is 0.91m longer than the 1992 Moody 41. The 1998 Feeling 44 displaces approximately 7% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1992 Moody 41 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.53 and 70.0 m² of sail area. The 1998 Feeling 44, with an SA/D of 17.37 and 82.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1998 Feeling 44 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1992 Moody 41 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.72). The 1998 Feeling 44 has a comfort ratio of 16.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 38.8% for the 1992 Moody 41 and 38.1% for the 1998 Feeling 44, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1992 Moody 41 provides 7 berths in 3 cabins with 360L of water capacity and 180L of fuel. The 1998 Feeling 44 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 400L water and 200L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1992 Moody 41 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1998 Feeling 44 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1998 Feeling 44 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1992 Moody 41 · 1998 Feeling 44