1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 vs Hanse 320 — Comparison

1995 Beneteau Oceanis 3211995 Beneteau Oceanis 321
VS
Hanse 320Hanse 320

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321Hanse 320
General
ManufacturerBeneteauHanse
Year1995–20012005–2010
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFranceGermany
DesignerGroupe Finotjudel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA9.68 m (31.8 ft)9.92 m (32.5 ft)
LWL8.45 m (27.7 ft)8.80 m (28.9 ft)
Beam3.27 m (10.7 ft)3.28 m (10.8 ft)
Draft1.60 m (5.2 ft)1.70 m (5.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,200 kg (9,259 lbs)4,600 kg (10,141 lbs)
Ballast1,500 kg (3,307 lbs)1,400 kg (3,086 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area44.5 m² (479 ft²)46.0 m² (495 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)90 L (23.8 gal)
Water Capacity120 L (31.7 gal)150 L (39.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321
17.37
Hanse 320
16.90
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321
35.71
Hanse 320
30.43
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321
0.81
Hanse 320
0.79
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321
17.12
Hanse 320
17.40

Detailed Comparison

The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 and Hanse 320 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 is a 1990s design by Beneteau from France, while the Hanse 320 is a 2000s offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 was penned by Groupe Finot. The Hanse 320 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 measures 9.68m (31.8ft) overall with a beam of 3.27m, compared to the Hanse 320 at 9.92m (32.5ft) with a 3.28m beam. The Hanse 320 is 0.24m longer than the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321. The Hanse 320 displaces approximately 10% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.37 and 44.5 m² of sail area. The Hanse 320, with an SA/D of 16.90 and 46.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.81). The Hanse 320 has a comfort ratio of 17.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.79. The ballast ratios are 35.7% for the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 and 30.4% for the Hanse 320, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 120L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The Hanse 320 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L water and 90L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Hanse 320 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 · Hanse 320