1996 Hunter 290 vs Bavaria Cruiser 34 — Comparison

1996 Hunter 2901996 Hunter 290
VS
Bavaria Cruiser 34Bavaria Cruiser 34

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1996 Hunter 290Bavaria Cruiser 34
General
ManufacturerHunterBavaria
Year1996–20002010–2017
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAGermany
DesignerGlenn HendersonFarr Yacht Design
Dimensions
LOA8.84 m (29.0 ft)10.25 m (33.6 ft)
LWL7.47 m (24.5 ft)9.15 m (30.0 ft)
Beam2.97 m (9.7 ft)3.42 m (11.2 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,493 kg (7,701 lbs)5,500 kg (12,125 lbs)
Ballast1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)1,700 kg (3,748 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area38.9 m² (419 ft²)50.0 m² (538 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)90 L (23.8 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)180 L (47.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1996 Hunter 290
17.17
Bavaria Cruiser 34
16.30
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1996 Hunter 290
38.96
Bavaria Cruiser 34
30.91
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1996 Hunter 290
0.78
Bavaria Cruiser 34
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1996 Hunter 290
20.27
Bavaria Cruiser 34
18.28

Detailed Comparison

The 1996 Hunter 290 and Bavaria Cruiser 34 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1996 Hunter 290 is a 1990s design by Hunter from USA, while the Bavaria Cruiser 34 is a modern offering from Bavaria from Germany. The 1996 Hunter 290 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The Bavaria Cruiser 34 was designed by Farr Yacht Design.

In terms of size, the 1996 Hunter 290 measures 8.84m (29.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.97m, compared to the Bavaria Cruiser 34 at 10.25m (33.6ft) with a 3.42m beam. The Bavaria Cruiser 34 is 1.41m longer than the 1996 Hunter 290. The Bavaria Cruiser 34 displaces approximately 57% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1996 Hunter 290 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.17 and 38.9 m² of sail area. The Bavaria Cruiser 34, with an SA/D of 16.30 and 50.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1996 Hunter 290 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1996 Hunter 290 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The Bavaria Cruiser 34 has a comfort ratio of 18.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 39.0% for the 1996 Hunter 290 and 30.9% for the Bavaria Cruiser 34, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1996 Hunter 290 provides 6 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The Bavaria Cruiser 34 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L water and 90L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1996 Hunter 290 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1996 Hunter 290 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1996 Hunter 290 · Bavaria Cruiser 34