1997 Dufour 30 Classic vs Hunter 212 — Comparison

1997 Dufour 30 Classic
VS
Hunter 212Hunter 212

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1997 Dufour 30 ClassicHunter 212
General
ManufacturerDufourHunter
Year1997–20032003–2008
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFranceUSA
DesignerUmberto FelciGlenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA9.15 m (30.0 ft)6.35 m (20.8 ft)
LWL7.80 m (25.6 ft)5.56 m (18.2 ft)
Beam3.10 m (10.2 ft)2.26 m (7.4 ft)
Draft1.60 m (5.2 ft)0.99 m (3.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,800 kg (8,378 lbs)680 kg (1,499 lbs)
Ballast1,400 kg (3,086 lbs)168 kg (370 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area40.0 m² (431 ft²)16.0 m² (172 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinCenterboard
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP4 HP
Fuel Capacity50 L (13.2 gal)
Water Capacity90 L (23.8 gal)15 L (4.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths53
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1997 Dufour 30 Classic
16.69
Hunter 212
21.04
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1997 Dufour 30 Classic
36.84
Hunter 212
24.71
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1997 Dufour 30 Classic
0.80
Hunter 212
1.03
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1997 Dufour 30 Classic
19.22
Hunter 212
10.50

Detailed Comparison

The 1997 Dufour 30 Classic and Hunter 212 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1997 Dufour 30 Classic is a 1990s design by Dufour from France, while the Hunter 212 is a 2000s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1997 Dufour 30 Classic was penned by Umberto Felci. The Hunter 212 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the 1997 Dufour 30 Classic measures 9.15m (30.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.10m, compared to the Hunter 212 at 6.35m (20.8ft) with a 2.26m beam. The 1997 Dufour 30 Classic is 2.80m longer than the Hunter 212. The 1997 Dufour 30 Classic displaces approximately 459% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1997 Dufour 30 Classic has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.69 and 40.0 m² of sail area. The Hunter 212, with an SA/D of 21.04 and 16.0 m² of canvas, offers generous sail power for spirited sailing. The Hunter 212 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1997 Dufour 30 Classic offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The Hunter 212 has a comfort ratio of 10.5 and a capsize screening value of 1.03. The ballast ratios are 36.8% for the 1997 Dufour 30 Classic and 24.7% for the Hunter 212, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1997 Dufour 30 Classic provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 90L of water capacity and 50L of fuel. The Hunter 212 offers 3 berths in 1 cabin with 15L water and unspecified fuel.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1997 Dufour 30 Classic is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 212 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1997 Dufour 30 Classic offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1997 Dufour 30 Classic · Hunter 212