1997 Nautor Swan 48 vs 2014 Amel 55 — Comparison

1997 Nautor Swan 481997 Nautor Swan 48
VS
2014 Amel 552014 Amel 55

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1997 Nautor Swan 482014 Amel 55
General
ManufacturerNautor SwanAmel
Year1997–20042014–2021
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFinlandFrance
DesignerGerman FrersOlivier Racoupeau
Dimensions
LOA14.63 m (48.0 ft)16.80 m (55.1 ft)
LWL12.19 m (40.0 ft)14.20 m (46.6 ft)
Beam4.24 m (13.9 ft)4.75 m (15.6 ft)
Draft2.50 m (8.2 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement13,608 kg (30,000 lbs)19,500 kg (42,990 lbs)
Ballast5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)6,800 kg (14,991 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area105.0 m² (1,130 ft²)120.0 m² (1,292 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine75 HP110 HP
Fuel Capacity250 L (66.0 gal)580 L (153.2 gal)
Water Capacity450 L (118.9 gal)780 L (206.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths77
Cabins33

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1997 Nautor Swan 48
18.71
2014 Amel 55
16.82
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1997 Nautor Swan 48
40.00
2014 Amel 55
34.87
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1997 Nautor Swan 48
0.71
2014 Amel 55
0.71
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1997 Nautor Swan 48
18.28
2014 Amel 55
16.75

Detailed Comparison

The 1997 Nautor Swan 48 and 2014 Amel 55 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1997 Nautor Swan 48 is a 1990s design by Nautor Swan from Finland, while the 2014 Amel 55 is a modern offering from Amel from France. The 1997 Nautor Swan 48 was penned by German Frers. The 2014 Amel 55 was designed by Olivier Racoupeau.

In terms of size, the 1997 Nautor Swan 48 measures 14.63m (48.0ft) overall with a beam of 4.24m, compared to the 2014 Amel 55 at 16.80m (55.1ft) with a 4.75m beam. The 2014 Amel 55 is 2.17m longer than the 1997 Nautor Swan 48. The 2014 Amel 55 displaces approximately 43% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1997 Nautor Swan 48 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.71 and 105.0 m² of sail area. The 2014 Amel 55, with an SA/D of 16.82 and 120.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1997 Nautor Swan 48 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1997 Nautor Swan 48 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.71). The 2014 Amel 55 has a comfort ratio of 16.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.71. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1997 Nautor Swan 48 and 34.9% for the 2014 Amel 55, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1997 Nautor Swan 48 provides 7 berths in 3 cabins with 450L of water capacity and 250L of fuel. The 2014 Amel 55 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 780L water and 580L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1997 Nautor Swan 48 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1997 Nautor Swan 48 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1997 Nautor Swan 48 · 2014 Amel 55