1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC vs 1983 Pearson 31 — Comparison

1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC
VS
1983 Pearson 311983 Pearson 31

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC1983 Pearson 31
General
ManufacturerBeneteauPearson
Year1998–20031983–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFranceUSA
DesignerGroupe FinotWilliam Shaw
Dimensions
LOA10.97 m (36.0 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
LWL9.45 m (31.0 ft)7.77 m (25.5 ft)
Beam3.65 m (12.0 ft)3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,100 kg (15,653 lbs)4,309 kg (9,500 lbs)
Ballast2,500 kg (5,512 lbs)1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area59.0 m² (635 ft²)40.0 m² (431 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine28 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity100 L (26.4 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity200 L (52.8 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC
16.23
1983 Pearson 31
15.35
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC
35.21
1983 Pearson 31
42.10
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC
0.76
1983 Pearson 31
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC
19.82
1983 Pearson 31
21.43

Detailed Comparison

The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC and 1983 Pearson 31 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC is a 1990s design by Beneteau from France, while the 1983 Pearson 31 is a 1980s offering from Pearson from USA. The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC was penned by Groupe Finot. The 1983 Pearson 31 was designed by William Shaw.

In terms of size, the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC measures 10.97m (36.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.65m, compared to the 1983 Pearson 31 at 9.45m (31.0ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC is 1.52m longer than the 1983 Pearson 31. The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC displaces approximately 65% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.23 and 59.0 m² of sail area. The 1983 Pearson 31, with an SA/D of 15.35 and 40.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1983 Pearson 31 has a comfort ratio of 21.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 35.2% for the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC and 42.1% for the 1983 Pearson 31, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 200L of water capacity and 100L of fuel. The 1983 Pearson 31 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1983 Pearson 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC · 1983 Pearson 31