1998 Catalina 42 vs 2007 Moody 46 — Comparison

1998 Catalina 421998 Catalina 42
VS
2007 Moody 46

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1998 Catalina 422007 Moody 46
General
ManufacturerCatalinaMoody
Year1998–20042007–2014
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAGermany
DesignerGerry DouglasBill Dixon
Dimensions
LOA12.80 m (42.0 ft)13.95 m (45.8 ft)
LWL10.82 m (35.5 ft)12.30 m (40.4 ft)
Beam3.96 m (13.0 ft)4.49 m (14.7 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.89 m (6.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,525 kg (20,999 lbs)14,500 kg (31,967 lbs)
Ballast3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)5,200 kg (11,464 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area72.5 m² (780 ft²)96.0 m² (1,033 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP75 HP
Fuel Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)300 L (79.3 gal)
Water Capacity303 L (80.0 gal)500 L (132.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths88
Cabins33

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1998 Catalina 42
16.39
2007 Moody 46
16.40
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1998 Catalina 42
40.48
2007 Moody 46
35.86
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1998 Catalina 42
0.75
2007 Moody 46
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1998 Catalina 42
17.96
2007 Moody 46
18.40

Detailed Comparison

The 1998 Catalina 42 and 2007 Moody 46 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1998 Catalina 42 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the 2007 Moody 46 is a 2000s offering from Moody from Germany. The 1998 Catalina 42 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 2007 Moody 46 was designed by Bill Dixon.

In terms of size, the 1998 Catalina 42 measures 12.80m (42.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.96m, compared to the 2007 Moody 46 at 13.95m (45.8ft) with a 4.49m beam. The 2007 Moody 46 is 1.15m longer than the 1998 Catalina 42. The 2007 Moody 46 displaces approximately 52% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1998 Catalina 42 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.39 and 72.5 m² of sail area. The 2007 Moody 46, with an SA/D of 16.40 and 96.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2007 Moody 46 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1998 Catalina 42 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 2007 Moody 46 has a comfort ratio of 18.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 40.5% for the 1998 Catalina 42 and 35.9% for the 2007 Moody 46, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1998 Catalina 42 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 303L of water capacity and 151L of fuel. The 2007 Moody 46 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 500L water and 300L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2007 Moody 46 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2007 Moody 46 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1998 Catalina 42 · 2007 Moody 46