1998 Catalina 42 vs Bavaria C42 — Comparison

1998 Catalina 421998 Catalina 42
VS
Bavaria C42Bavaria C42

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1998 Catalina 42Bavaria C42
General
ManufacturerCatalinaBavaria
Year1998–20042018
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAGermany
DesignerGerry Douglascossutti yacht design
Dimensions
LOA12.80 m (42.0 ft)12.88 m (42.3 ft)
LWL10.82 m (35.5 ft)11.25 m (36.9 ft)
Beam3.96 m (13.0 ft)4.09 m (13.4 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,525 kg (20,999 lbs)8,900 kg (19,621 lbs)
Ballast3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)2,750 kg (6,063 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area72.5 m² (780 ft²)76.0 m² (818 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP45 HP
Fuel Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Water Capacity303 L (80.0 gal)340 L (89.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths88
Cabins33

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1998 Catalina 42
16.39
Bavaria C42
17.98
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1998 Catalina 42
40.48
Bavaria C42
30.90
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1998 Catalina 42
0.75
Bavaria C42
0.79
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1998 Catalina 42
17.96
Bavaria C42
15.20

Detailed Comparison

The 1998 Catalina 42 and Bavaria C42 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1998 Catalina 42 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the Bavaria C42 is a modern offering from Bavaria from Germany. The 1998 Catalina 42 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The Bavaria C42 was designed by cossutti yacht design.

In terms of size, the 1998 Catalina 42 measures 12.80m (42.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.96m, compared to the Bavaria C42 at 12.88m (42.3ft) with a 4.09m beam. The Bavaria C42 is 0.08m longer than the 1998 Catalina 42. The 1998 Catalina 42 displaces approximately 7% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1998 Catalina 42 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.39 and 72.5 m² of sail area. The Bavaria C42, with an SA/D of 17.98 and 76.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Bavaria C42 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1998 Catalina 42 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The Bavaria C42 has a comfort ratio of 15.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.79. The ballast ratios are 40.5% for the 1998 Catalina 42 and 30.9% for the Bavaria C42, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1998 Catalina 42 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 303L of water capacity and 151L of fuel. The Bavaria C42 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 340L water and 200L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1998 Catalina 42 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Bavaria C42 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1998 Catalina 42 · Bavaria C42