1998 Dehler 29 vs 1982 Westerly Konsort — Comparison

1998 Dehler 29
VS
1982 Westerly Konsort1982 Westerly Konsort

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1998 Dehler 291982 Westerly Konsort
General
ManufacturerDehlerWesterly
Year1998–20061982–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyUK
DesignerJudel/VrolijkEd Dubois
Dimensions
LOA8.82 m (28.9 ft)9.50 m (31.2 ft)
LWL7.60 m (24.9 ft)7.70 m (25.3 ft)
Beam2.95 m (9.7 ft)3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft1.55 m (5.1 ft)1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,200 kg (7,055 lbs)4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast1,200 kg (2,646 lbs)1,633 kg (3,600 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area35.0 m² (377 ft²)34.0 m² (366 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinBilge
Engine & Tanks
Engine14 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity40 L (10.6 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity80 L (21.1 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1998 Dehler 29
16.38
1982 Westerly Konsort
12.61
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1998 Dehler 29
37.50
1982 Westerly Konsort
36.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1998 Dehler 29
0.80
1982 Westerly Konsort
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1998 Dehler 29
18.34
1982 Westerly Konsort
22.75

Detailed Comparison

The 1998 Dehler 29 and 1982 Westerly Konsort represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1998 Dehler 29 is a 1990s design by Dehler from Germany, while the 1982 Westerly Konsort is a 1980s offering from Westerly from UK. The 1998 Dehler 29 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The 1982 Westerly Konsort was designed by Ed Dubois.

In terms of size, the 1998 Dehler 29 measures 8.82m (28.9ft) overall with a beam of 2.95m, compared to the 1982 Westerly Konsort at 9.50m (31.2ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 1982 Westerly Konsort is 0.68m longer than the 1998 Dehler 29. The 1982 Westerly Konsort displaces approximately 42% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1998 Dehler 29 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.38 and 35.0 m² of sail area. The 1982 Westerly Konsort, with an SA/D of 12.61 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1998 Dehler 29 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1998 Dehler 29 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 1982 Westerly Konsort has a comfort ratio of 22.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 37.5% for the 1998 Dehler 29 and 36.0% for the 1982 Westerly Konsort, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1998 Dehler 29 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 80L of water capacity and 40L of fuel. The 1982 Westerly Konsort offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 Westerly Konsort is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1998 Dehler 29 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1982 Westerly Konsort offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1998 Dehler 29 · 1982 Westerly Konsort