1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 vs 1988 Island Packet 32 — Comparison
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 | 1988 Island Packet 32 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Pacific Seacraft | Island Packet |
| Year | 1999–2007 | 1988–1997 |
| Type | Cutter | Cutter |
| Country | USA | USA |
| Designer | William Crealock | Bob Johnson |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 12.19 m (40.0 ft) | 9.75 m (32.0 ft) |
| LWL | 9.75 m (32.0 ft) | 8.38 m (27.5 ft) |
| Beam | 3.66 m (12.0 ft) | 3.35 m (11.0 ft) |
| Draft | 1.83 m (6.0 ft) | 1.22 m (4.0 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 9,525 kg (20,999 lbs) | 5,443 kg (12,000 lbs) |
| Ballast | 3,856 kg (8,501 lbs) | 2,268 kg (5,000 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 70.0 m² (754 ft²) | 44.5 m² (479 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Full | Full |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 55 HP | 25 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 189 L (49.9 gal) | 114 L (30.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 340 L (89.8 gal) | 189 L (49.9 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 7 | 6 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 and 1988 Island Packet 32 represent two takes on cutter-rigged sailing. The 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 is a 1990s design by Pacific Seacraft from USA, while the 1988 Island Packet 32 is a 1980s offering from Island Packet from USA. The 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 was penned by William Crealock. The 1988 Island Packet 32 was designed by Bob Johnson.
In terms of size, the 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 measures 12.19m (40.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.66m, compared to the 1988 Island Packet 32 at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 is 2.44m longer than the 1988 Island Packet 32. The 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 displaces approximately 75% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.83 and 70.0 m² of sail area. The 1988 Island Packet 32, with an SA/D of 14.61 and 44.5 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 23.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.69). The 1988 Island Packet 32 has a comfort ratio of 21.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 40.5% for the 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 and 41.7% for the 1988 Island Packet 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 340L of water capacity and 189L of fuel. The 1988 Island Packet 32 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 189L water and 114L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 · 1988 Island Packet 32