2001 Hallberg-Rassy 53 vs 2013 Moody 54 — Comparison

2001 Hallberg-Rassy 53
VS
2013 Moody 542013 Moody 54

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2001 Hallberg-Rassy 532013 Moody 54
General
ManufacturerHallberg-RassyMoody
Year2001–20102013–2018
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenGermany
DesignerGerman FrersBill Dixon
Dimensions
LOA16.20 m (53.1 ft)16.18 m (53.1 ft)
LWL13.50 m (44.3 ft)14.50 m (47.6 ft)
Beam4.55 m (14.9 ft)4.90 m (16.1 ft)
Draft2.30 m (7.5 ft)2.15 m (7.1 ft)
Weight
Displacement18,000 kg (39,683 lbs)21,000 kg (46,297 lbs)
Ballast6,800 kg (14,991 lbs)7,500 kg (16,535 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area118.0 m² (1,270 ft²)125.0 m² (1,346 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine130 HP110 HP
Fuel Capacity500 L (132.1 gal)450 L (118.9 gal)
Water Capacity800 L (211.3 gal)700 L (184.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths88
Cabins43

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2001 Hallberg-Rassy 53
17.45
2013 Moody 54
16.68
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2001 Hallberg-Rassy 53
37.78
2013 Moody 54
35.71
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2001 Hallberg-Rassy 53
0.70
2013 Moody 54
0.71
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2001 Hallberg-Rassy 53
17.95
2013 Moody 54
17.25

Detailed Comparison

The 2001 Hallberg-Rassy 53 and 2013 Moody 54 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2001 Hallberg-Rassy 53 is a 2000s design by Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden, while the 2013 Moody 54 is a modern offering from Moody from Germany. The 2001 Hallberg-Rassy 53 was penned by German Frers. The 2013 Moody 54 was designed by Bill Dixon.

In terms of size, the 2001 Hallberg-Rassy 53 measures 16.20m (53.1ft) overall with a beam of 4.55m, compared to the 2013 Moody 54 at 16.18m (53.1ft) with a 4.90m beam. The 2001 Hallberg-Rassy 53 is 0.02m longer than the 2013 Moody 54. The 2013 Moody 54 displaces approximately 17% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2001 Hallberg-Rassy 53 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.45 and 118.0 m² of sail area. The 2013 Moody 54, with an SA/D of 16.68 and 125.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2001 Hallberg-Rassy 53 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2001 Hallberg-Rassy 53 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.70). The 2013 Moody 54 has a comfort ratio of 17.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.71. The ballast ratios are 37.8% for the 2001 Hallberg-Rassy 53 and 35.7% for the 2013 Moody 54, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2001 Hallberg-Rassy 53 provides 8 berths in 4 cabins with 800L of water capacity and 500L of fuel. The 2013 Moody 54 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 700L water and 450L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2001 Hallberg-Rassy 53 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2001 Hallberg-Rassy 53 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2001 Hallberg-Rassy 53 · 2013 Moody 54