2003 Catalina 310 vs Hunter 30 — Comparison

2003 Catalina 3102003 Catalina 310
VS
Hunter 30Hunter 30

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2003 Catalina 310Hunter 30
General
ManufacturerCatalinaHunter
Year2003–20071991–1996
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGerry DouglasHunter Design Team
Dimensions
LOA9.45 m (31.0 ft)9.14 m (30.0 ft)
LWL8.38 m (27.5 ft)7.92 m (26.0 ft)
Beam3.30 m (10.8 ft)3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)
Ballast1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)1,588 kg (3,501 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area45.3 m² (488 ft²)41.0 m² (441 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2003 Catalina 310
16.80
Hunter 30
16.94
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2003 Catalina 310
39.99
Hunter 30
41.18
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2003 Catalina 310
0.80
Hunter 30
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2003 Catalina 310
18.77
Hunter 30
19.54

Detailed Comparison

The 2003 Catalina 310 and Hunter 30 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2003 Catalina 310 is a 2000s design by Catalina from USA, while the Hunter 30 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 2003 Catalina 310 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The Hunter 30 was designed by Hunter Design Team.

In terms of size, the 2003 Catalina 310 measures 9.45m (31.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.30m, compared to the Hunter 30 at 9.14m (30.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 2003 Catalina 310 is 0.31m longer than the Hunter 30. The 2003 Catalina 310 displaces approximately 18% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2003 Catalina 310 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.80 and 45.3 m² of sail area. The Hunter 30, with an SA/D of 16.94 and 41.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hunter 30 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2003 Catalina 310 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The Hunter 30 has a comfort ratio of 19.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 2003 Catalina 310 and 41.2% for the Hunter 30, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2003 Catalina 310 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The Hunter 30 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Hunter 30 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 30 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2003 Catalina 310 · Hunter 30