2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II vs 1996 Moody 45 — Comparison

2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II
VS
1996 Moody 451996 Moody 45

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II1996 Moody 45
General
ManufacturerHallberg-RassyMoody
Year2003–20141996–2002
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenUK
DesignerGerman FrersBill Dixon
Dimensions
LOA13.15 m (43.1 ft)13.72 m (45.0 ft)
LWL11.00 m (36.1 ft)11.50 m (37.7 ft)
Beam4.05 m (13.3 ft)4.22 m (13.8 ft)
Draft2.05 m (6.7 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement11,500 kg (25,353 lbs)12,500 kg (27,558 lbs)
Ballast4,500 kg (9,921 lbs)4,900 kg (10,803 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area84.0 m² (904 ft²)85.0 m² (915 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine75 HP55 HP
Fuel Capacity250 L (66.0 gal)250 L (66.0 gal)
Water Capacity500 L (132.1 gal)450 L (118.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths78
Cabins33

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II
16.75
1996 Moody 45
16.03
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II
39.13
1996 Moody 45
39.20
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II
0.72
1996 Moody 45
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II
20.22
1996 Moody 45
19.06

Detailed Comparison

The 2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II and 1996 Moody 45 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II is a 2000s design by Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden, while the 1996 Moody 45 is a 1990s offering from Moody from UK. The 2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II was penned by German Frers. The 1996 Moody 45 was designed by Bill Dixon.

In terms of size, the 2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II measures 13.15m (43.1ft) overall with a beam of 4.05m, compared to the 1996 Moody 45 at 13.72m (45.0ft) with a 4.22m beam. The 1996 Moody 45 is 0.57m longer than the 2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II. The 1996 Moody 45 displaces approximately 9% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.75 and 84.0 m² of sail area. The 1996 Moody 45, with an SA/D of 16.03 and 85.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.72). The 1996 Moody 45 has a comfort ratio of 19.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 39.1% for the 2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II and 39.2% for the 1996 Moody 45, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II provides 7 berths in 3 cabins with 500L of water capacity and 250L of fuel. The 1996 Moody 45 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 450L water and 250L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1996 Moody 45 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II · 1996 Moody 45